Literature DB >> 35033899

Proprioception-based movement goals support imitation and are disrupted in apraxia.

Mitchell W Isaacs1, Laurel J Buxbaum1, Aaron L Wong2.   

Abstract

The ability to imitate observed actions serves as an efficient method for learning novel movements and is specifically impaired (without concomitant gross motor impairments) in the neurological disorder of limb apraxia, a disorder common after left hemisphere stroke. Research with apraxic patients has advanced our understanding of how people imitate. However, the role of proprioception in imitation has been rarely assessed directly. Prior work has proposed that proprioceptively sensed body position is transformed into a visual format, supporting the attainment of a desired imitation goal represented visually (i.e., how the movement should look when performed). In contrast, we hypothesized a more direct role for proprioception: we suggest that movement goals are also represented proprioceptively (i.e., how a desired movement should feel when performed), and the ability to represent or access such proprioceptive goals is deficient in apraxia. Using a novel imitation task in which a robot cued meaningless trajectories proprioceptively or visually, we probed the role of each sensory modality. We found that patients with left hemisphere stroke were disproportionately worse than controls at imitating when cued proprioceptively versus visually. This proprioceptive versus visual disparity was associated with apraxia severity as assessed by a traditional imitation task, but could not be explained by general proprioceptive impairment or speed-accuracy trade-offs. These data suggest that successful imitation depends in part on the ability to represent movement goals in terms of how those movements should feel, and that deficits in this ability contribute to imitation impairments in patients with apraxia.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apraxia; Imitation; Motor goal; Proprioception; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35033899      PMCID: PMC8852218          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  65 in total

1.  Tapping, grasping and aiming in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Magdalena Ietswaart; David P Carey; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Dominance of vision over proprioception on motor programming: evidence from ERP.

Authors:  Pascale Touzalin-Chretien; Solange Ehrler; André Dufour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Defective imitation of finger configurations in patients with damage in the right or left hemispheres: An integration disorder of visual and somatosensory information?

Authors:  Manabu Okita; Takashi Yukihiro; Kenzo Miyamoto; Shu Morioka; Hideto Kaba
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning?

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Dinant A Kistemaker; Alvin Chin; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Kathleen M Kyle; Rukmini Menon
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

7.  Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Trained motor imitation by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Authors:  G B Bauer; C M Johnson
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-12

9.  Robotic identification of kinesthetic deficits after stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Troy M Herter; Stephen H Scott; Sean P Dukelow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.