Literature DB >> 1521211

Effect of nonmedical factors on family physicians' decisions about referral for consultation.

G R Langley1, A M MacLellan, H J Sutherland, J E Till.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify nonmedical factors perceived by family physicians (FPs) and consultants as important influences on decisions about referral for consultation, to determine the relative frequency with which such factors are cited and to identify those factors ranked as most important by the FPs and consultants.
DESIGN: Survey with semistructured interview between July 1989 and April 1990. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 41 FPs and 20 consultants who were practising or had practised previously in Nova Scotia.
INTERVENTIONS: The questionnaire comprised 10 questions: 4 were nondirective "probes" designed to elicit responses without suggesting possible answers, 2 asked the participants to rank such responses in order of importance, and 4 were "prompts" that asked for comments about a list of factors based on a review of the literature.
RESULTS: A total of 4845 discrete items were mentioned as being capable of influencing FPs' decisions about referral for consultation. Aggregation of related items resulted in a list of 35 nonmedical factors, of which 11 were identified by at least half the respondents and 14 by less than half but more than 10. These 25 factors fell into three categories: patient and family factors (e.g., patient's wishes), FP and consultant factors (e.g., FP's capabilities), and other influences (e.g., style of practice). On the basis of both frequency of identification and priority scores "patient's wishes" emerged as the most important factor. Two medical factors that were consistently cited--type of problem and age of patient--were thought to interact with the other factors.
CONCLUSION: Certain nonmedical considerations may substantially affect physicians' referral practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1521211      PMCID: PMC1336387     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  26 in total

Review 1.  Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior?

Authors:  T V Jones; M S Gerrity; J Earp
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Do practice guidelines guide practice?

Authors:  J S Todd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Variation in general practitioners' referral rates to consultants.

Authors:  D Wilkin; A G Smith
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-08

5.  Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Physician utilization. The state of research about physicians' practice patterns.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Variations in medical care among small areas.

Authors:  J Wennberg; A Gittelsohn
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  An examination of the factors that influence patient referral decisions.

Authors:  R L Ludke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Doctors' perceptions of pressure from patients for referral.

Authors:  D Armstrong; J Fry; P Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-18

10.  Differences in medical referral decisions for obesity among family practitioners, general internists, and gynecologists.

Authors:  M L Rothert; D R Rovner; A S Elstein; G B Holzman; M M Holmes; M M Ravitch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  9 in total

1.  Income-related inequalities in visual impairment and eye screening services in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jongnam Hwang; Christopher Rudnisky; Sarah Bowen; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Yano; Lawrence W Green; Karen Glanz; John Z Ayanian; Brian S Mittman; Veronica Chollette; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

3.  Methods for analyzing referral patterns.

Authors:  M E Cowen; M W Zodet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Reasons for outpatient referrals from generalists to specialists.

Authors:  M T Donohoe; R L Kravitz; D B Wheeler; R Chandra; A Chen; N Humphries
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Regional variation in nonmedical factors affecting family physicians' decisions about referral for consultation.

Authors:  G R Langley; S Minkin; J E Till
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Health care sought and received by men with urinary symptoms, and their views on prostatectomy.

Authors:  D J Hunter; C M McKee; N A Black; C F Sanderson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  [Study on insomnia treatment by family physicians].

Authors:  L Baillargeon; M Demers; J P Grégoire; M Pépin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Understanding differences in access and use of healthcare between international immigrants to Chile and the Chilean-born: a repeated cross-sectional population-based study in Chile.

Authors:  Baltica Cabieses; Helena Tunstall; Kate E Pickett; Jasmine Gideon
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-11-16

9.  Does managed care make a difference? Physicians' length of stay decisions under managed and non-managed care.

Authors:  Judith D de Jong; Gert P Westert; Cheryl M Noetscher; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.