Literature DB >> 19830462

Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM).

Felix Roeder1, Dan Brüllmann, Bernd d'Hoedt, Ralf Schulze.   

Abstract

A reference-based radiographic "reference sphere method" (RSM) for accurate length measurements in (dental) projection radiographs for the assessment of tooth length in dry human mandible sections is evaluated. RSM determines the depth coordinates of reference spheres placed in the object plane from the elliptical distortion of their shadows. Two segments (one canine and one molar) of dry human mandibles were exposed 95 times at different angulations (0-40°) on a dental charge-coupled device receptor. Three steel spheres (diameters d (1) = 2.00 mm, d (2) = 3.00 mm) were attached roughly coplanar with the tooth's main axis. Radiographs were assessed once by visual inspection plus manual landmark identification with a mouse-driven cursor. The results were compared to the true tooth length assessed after extraction and to a conventional method (C), i.e., the rule of proportion based on magnification of the sphere shadows. Mean relative length error was 2.28% (d (1)) and 0.46% (d (2)) for RSM and -13.58% (d (1)) and -9.90% (d (2)) for C. For both methods, length errors were significantly (p <  0.0001) correlated with the inclination relative to the receptor. RSM allows for complete a posteriori determination of the imaging geometry under the assumption of a known source-to-receptor distance. One specific application is foreshortening correction of objects coplanar with the reference spheres. Remaining errors are mainly due to incorrect landmark definition. In our setup, these were exaggerated by the visual/manual image-evaluation process. Automated image analysis has been shown for similar tasks to minimize these errors considerably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19830462     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0350-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  29 in total

1.  A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in "paralleling technique".

Authors:  R K W Schulze; B d'Hoedt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Authors:  Y J Yoon; K S Kim; M S Hwang; H J Kim; E H Choi; K W Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss; validity of different filters.

Authors:  P Eickholz; T Riess; M Lenhard; S Hassfeld; H J Staehle
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Comparing precision of distortion-compensated and stereophotogrammetric Roentgen analysis when monitoring fusion in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Gunnar Leivseth; Frode Kolstad; Oystein P Nygaard; Björn Zoega; W Frobin; P Brinckmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs.

Authors:  Siddik Malkoc; Zafer Sari; Serdar Usumez; Alp Erdin Koyuturk
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction.

Authors:  Clayton B Williams; Anthony P Joyce; Steven Roberts
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 7.  Quantifying magnification in pedal radiographs.

Authors:  C A Camasta; J Pontious; R B Boyd
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1991-10

8.  Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs.

Authors:  B Dubrez; S Jacot-Descombes; G Cimasoni
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1995-09

9.  The intermetatarsal and metatarsal declination angles: geometry as a source of error.

Authors:  René Weijers; Gerrit Kemerink; Henk van Mameren; Geert Walenkamp; Alphons G H Kessels
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alf Volchansky; Peter Cleaton-Jones; Sîan Drummond; Marcelo Bönecker
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.677

View more
  5 in total

1.  Spatial relation between a rigid (digital) intraoral X-ray receptor and longitudinal axes of maxillary teeth.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Isabell von Rechenberg; Bernd d'Hoedt; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Pose determination of a blade implant in three dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph.

Authors:  Paolo Toti; Antonio Barone; Simone Marconcini; Giovanni Battista Menchini-Fabris; Ranieri Martuscelli; Ugo Covani
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A new digital tool for radiographic bone level measurements in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Hans R Preus; Gerald Ruiner Torgersen; Odd Carsten Koldsland; Bjørn Frode Hansen; Anne Merete Aass; Tore Arne Larheim; Leiv Sandvik
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Standardization of three-dimensional pose of cylindrical implants from intraoral radiographs: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Saverio Cosola; Paolo Toti; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Ugo Covani; Bruno Carlo Brevi; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Using acrylic customized X-ray positioning stents for long-term follow-up studies.

Authors:  Sherif Aly Sadek; Hisham Mohamed Abbas; Moayad Alfelali; Abdulaziz Almahdali
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-10-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.