Literature DB >> 20499116

Spatial relation between a rigid (digital) intraoral X-ray receptor and longitudinal axes of maxillary teeth.

Felix Roeder1, Isabell von Rechenberg, Bernd d'Hoedt, Ralf Schulze.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the existing (inevitable) angle which in intraoral radiology appears between tooth length axis and receptor caused by the anatomical situation. Especially in the upper jaw, due to its arched anatomy, a true "paralleling technique" is not achievable. The angulation necessarily causes distortion and a foreshortening of the image; hence, the foreshortened image leads to misinterpretations in diagnostics. We investigated the effects of the realistic angulation on these image deteriorating factors. Two hundred ninety-four plaster models of the upper jaw were collected, and the angles between a dummy receptor and the axes of the central incisor or the first molar were measured. For evaluation, a rigid dummy of an intraoral charge-coupled device (CCD) receptor (30 mm × 40 mm) was used. The mean angulation evaluated for central incisors was 36.7° (range 19-56°) and for first molars 42.5° (range 26-56°). This leads to a foreshortening of the tooth ranging from 5.4% to 44.1% in the image, when magnification is neglected. Large angles of up to 56°, in both incisor and molar region, result in a relevant underestimation of true tooth length up to 44%. It is important to note that this error cannot be simply corrected by means of local magnification correction. Techniques should be developed that allow for automated assessment of the effective angle to provide information for distortion correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499116     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0430-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  19 in total

1.  A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in "paralleling technique".

Authors:  R K W Schulze; B d'Hoedt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Charbel BouSerhal; Reinhilde Jacobs; Marc Quirynen; Daniel van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.932

3.  Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography.

Authors:  Ralf Schulze; Dan Dominik Bruellmann; Felix Roeder; Bernd d'Hoedt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  An overview of radiographic film holders.

Authors:  D A Dixon; C F Hildebolt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction.

Authors:  Clayton B Williams; Anthony P Joyce; Steven Roberts
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 6.  A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes.

Authors:  D K Benn
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  Pose determination of a cylindrical (dental) implant in three-dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph.

Authors:  R K W Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM).

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Dan Brüllmann; Bernd d'Hoedt; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Radiographic amelocemental junction and alveolar crest: effect of X-ray beam angulation.

Authors:  S M Jenkins; P M Dummer; R G Newcombe
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs.

Authors:  B Dubrez; S Jacot-Descombes; G Cimasoni
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1995-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  A new digital tool for radiographic bone level measurements in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Hans R Preus; Gerald Ruiner Torgersen; Odd Carsten Koldsland; Bjørn Frode Hansen; Anne Merete Aass; Tore Arne Larheim; Leiv Sandvik
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Detectability of simulated apical lesions on mandibular premolars and molars between radiographic intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography images: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Thomas Gerhard Wolf; Fernando Castañeda-López; Lisa Gleißner; Ralf Schulze; Robert Kuchen; Benjamín Briseño-Marroquín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.