Literature DB >> 15947234

The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs.

Siddik Malkoc1, Zafer Sari, Serdar Usumez, Alp Erdin Koyuturk.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the potential projection errors of lateral, postero-anterior (PA) and submentovertex (SMV) cephalometric radiographs due to head rotation in the vertical z-axis. For this investigation, a complete human dry skull of an adult was used. The skull was rotated from 0 to +/-14 degrees at 2 degree intervals. A vertical axis, the z-axis, was used as the rotational axis to expose 15 lateral and 15 PA cephalometric radiographs. The skull was tilted on each side, again at 2 degree intervals, to expose the 15 SMV films. A series of linear and angular measurements was carried out on all cephalograms. The results revealed that horizontal linear and angular measurements between the horizontal planes on lateral cephalograms were subject to changes from 16.1 to 44.7 per cent with a 14 degree rotation of the head position. For PA cephalograms, again horizontal linear measurements, particularly mandibular length, were subject to a projection error of up to 34.9 per cent with head rotation. On the other hand, projection errors were within the 3-4 per cent limit for SMV radiography. The findings indicate that: (1) linear measurements and the measurement of angles between the horizontal planes are likely to be affected by head rotation in lateral cephalograms, (2) angular measurements demonstrate smaller variations with changing rotation of the head in PA cephalograms, (3) SMV radiographs are less vulnerable to head rotation. Vertical linear measurements of lateral cephalograms and angular measurements of PA radiographs are more reliable in minimizing the projection errors associated with head rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15947234     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjh098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.

Authors:  U Oz; K Orhan; N Abe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Dry skull positioning device for extra-oral radiology and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Thiago Leite Beaini; Paulo Eduardo Miamoto Dias; Rodolfo Francisco Haltenhoff Melani
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM).

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Dan Brüllmann; Bernd d'Hoedt; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effects of head positioning on cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  M Berneburg; B Koos; R Kratochwil; A Godt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.

Authors:  Abbas Shokri; Amirfarhang Miresmaeili; Nasrin Farhadian; Sepideh Falah-Kooshki; Payam Amini; Najmeh Mollaie
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.

Authors:  Dan Grauer; Lucia S H Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; Inam Heulfe; Eric T Harmon; Hongtu Zhu; William R Proffit
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  Vandana Kumar; John Ludlow; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  ENPP1 and ESR1 genotypes associated with subclassifications of craniofacial asymmetry and severity of temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Kay Chung; Tabitha Richards; Romain Nicot; Alexandre R Vieira; Christiane V Cruz; Gwénaël Raoul; Joel Ferri; James J Sciote
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.

Authors:  Huseyin Olmez; Serkan Gorgulu; Erol Akin; Ali Osman Bengi; Ibrahim Tekdemir; Fatih Ors
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of the CT scanogram for assessment of craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  Francis C C Lee; Joseph Harold Noar; Robert David Evans
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.