Literature DB >> 29227154

Pose determination of a blade implant in three dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph.

Paolo Toti1,2, Antonio Barone3, Simone Marconcini1,2, Giovanni Battista Menchini-Fabris1,2, Ranieri Martuscelli4, Ugo Covani1,2.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to introduce a mathematical method to estimate the correct pose of a blade by evaluating the radiographic features obtained from a single two-dimensional image. Blade-form implant bed preparation was performed using the piezosurgery device, and placement was attained with the use of magnetic mallet. The pose determination of the blade was described by means of three consecutive rotations defined by three angles of orientation (triplet φ, θ and ψ). Retrospective analysis on periapical radiographs was performed. This method was used to compare implant (axial length along the marker, i.e. the implant structure) vs angular correction factor (a trigonometric function of the triplet). The accuracy of the method was tested by generating two-dimensional radiographic simulations of the blades, which were then compared with the images of the implants as appearing on the real radiographs. Two patients had to be excluded from further evaluation because the values of the estimated pose angles showed a too-wide range to be effective for a good standardization of serial radiographs: intrapatient range from baseline to 1-year survey was > of a threshold determined by the clinicians (30°). The linear dependence between implant (CF°) and angular correction factor (CF^) was estimated by a robust linear regression, yielding the following coefficients: slope, 0.908; intercept, -0.092; and coefficient of determination, 0.924. The absolute error in accuracy was -0.29 ± 4.35, 0.23 ± 3.81 and 0.64 ± 1.18°, respectively, for the angles φ, θ and ψ. The present theoretical and experimental study established the possibility of determining, a posteriori, a unique triplet of angles (φ, θ and ψ) which described the pose of a blade upon a single two-dimensional radiograph, and of suggesting a method to detect cases in which the standardized geometric projection failed. The angular correction of the bone level yielded results very close to those obtained with an internal marker related to the implant length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29227154      PMCID: PMC5991754          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  14 in total

1.  3-year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark.

Authors:  T Jemt; U Lekholm; K Gröndahl
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Software for automated application of a reference-based method for a posteriori determination of the effective radiographic imaging geometry.

Authors:  R K W Schulze; O Weinheimer; D D Brüllmann; F Röder; B d'Hoedt; E Schoemer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Estimation of angulation of Brånemark titanium fixtures from radiographic thread images.

Authors:  I P Sewerin
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1991 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography.

Authors:  André Mol; Stanley M Dunn
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-09

5.  Pose determination of a cylindrical (dental) implant in three-dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph.

Authors:  R K W Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM).

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Dan Brüllmann; Bernd d'Hoedt; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Validity of radiographic measurement of interproximal bone loss.

Authors:  P Eickholz; T S Kim; D K Benn; H J Staehle
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-01

8.  Electrical mallet provides essential advantages in split-crest and immediate implant placement.

Authors:  Roberto Crespi; Paolo Capparè; Enrico Felice Gherlone
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

Review 9.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Fixed bicortical screw and blade implants as a non-standard solution to an edentulous (toothless) mandible.

Authors:  Juraj Strecha; Richard Jurkovic; Tomas Siebert; Patrik Prachar; Sonia Bartakova
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.344

View more
  2 in total

1.  Standardization of three-dimensional pose of cylindrical implants from intraoral radiographs: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Saverio Cosola; Paolo Toti; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Ugo Covani; Bruno Carlo Brevi; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 2.  Usefulness of Magnetic Mallet in Oral Surgery and Implantology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Bennardo; Selene Barone; Camillo Vocaturo; Ludovica Nucci; Alessandro Antonelli; Amerigo Giudice
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.