Literature DB >> 18522125

Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane.

Douglas Call1, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

Hydrogen gas can be produced by electrohydrogenesis in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) at greater yields than fermentation and at greater energy efficiencies than water electrolysis. It has been assumed that a membrane is needed in an MEC to avoid hydrogen losses due to bacterial consumption of the product gas. However, high cathodic hydrogen recoveries (78 +/- 1% to 96 +/- 1%) were achieved in an MEC despite the absence of a membrane between the electrodes (applied voltages of 0.3 < E(ap) < 0.8 V; 7.5 mS/cm solution conductivity). Through the use of a membrane-less system, a graphite fiber brush anode, and close electrode spacing, hydrogen production rates reached a maximum of 3.12 +/- 0.02 m3 H2/m3 reactor per day (292 +/- 1 A/m3) at an applied voltage of E(ap) = 0.8 V. This production rate is more than double that obtained in previous MEC studies. The energy efficiency relative to the electrical input decreased with applied voltage from 406 +/- 6% (E(ap) = 0.3 V) to 194 +/- 2% (E(ap) = 0.8 V). Overall energy efficiency relative to both E(ap) and energy of the substrate averaged 78 +/- 4%, with a maximum of 86 +/- 2% (1.02 +/- 0.05 m3 H2/m3 day, E(ap) = 0.4 V). At E(ap) = 0.2 V, the hydrogen recovery substantially decreased, and methane concentrations increased from an average of 1.9 +/- 1.3% (E(ap) = 0.3-0.8 V) to 28 +/- 0% of the gas, due to the long cycle time of the reactor. Increasing the solution conductivity to 20 mS/ cm increased hydrogen production rates for E(ap) = 0.3-0.6 V, but consistent reactor performance could not be obtained in the high conductivity solution at E(ap) > 0.6 V. These results demonstrate that high hydrogen recovery and production rates are possible in a single chamber MEC without a membrane, potentially reducing the costs of these systems and allowing for new and simpler designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18522125     DOI: 10.1021/es8001822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  36 in total

1.  Hydrogen production from inexhaustible supplies of fresh and salt water using microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cells.

Authors:  Younggy Kim; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Lactate oxidation coupled to iron or electrode reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA.

Authors:  Douglas F Call; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Redox control and hydrogen production in sediment caps using carbon cloth electrodes.

Authors:  Mei Sun; Fei Yan; Ruiling Zhang; Danny D Reible; Gregory V Lowry; Kelvin B Gregory
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Microbial electron uptake in microbial electrosynthesis: a mini-review.

Authors:  Rengasamy Karthikeyan; Rajesh Singh; Arpita Bose
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Electrochemical techniques for evaluating short-chain fatty acid utilization by bioanodes.

Authors:  Wendy Huang; Younggy Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Enrichment of microbial electrolysis cell biocathodes from sediment microbial fuel cell bioanodes.

Authors:  John M Pisciotta; Zehra Zaybak; Douglas F Call; Joo-Youn Nam; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Degradation of organics extracted from dewatered sludge by alkaline pretreatment in microbial electrolysis cell.

Authors:  Kai Hu; Lan Xu; Wei Chen; Shuo-Qiu Jia; Wei Wang; Feng Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Hydrogen production by geobacter species and a mixed consortium in a microbial electrolysis cell.

Authors:  Douglas F Call; Rachel C Wagner; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Microbiological and engineering aspects of biohydrogen production.

Authors:  Patrick C Hallenbeck; Dipankar Ghosh; Monika T Skonieczny; Viviane Yargeau
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.461

10.  Controlling accumulation of fermentation inhibitors in biorefinery recycle water using microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Abhijeet P Borole; Jonathan R Mielenz; Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya; Choo Y Hamilton
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.