Literature DB >> 19138783

Hydrogen and methane production from swine wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells.

Rachel C Wagner1, John M Regan, Sang-Eun Oh, Yi Zuo, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

The production of a useful and valuable product during swine wastewater treatment, such as hydrogen gas, could help to lower treatment costs. Hydrogen can theoretically be produced from wastewater by electrohydrogenesis in a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) or by fermentation. Using a single-chamber MEC with a graphite-fiber brush anode, hydrogen gas was generated at 0.9-1.0 m(3) m(-3) day(-1) H2 using a full-strength or diluted swine wastewater. COD removals ranged from 8 to 29% in 20-h tests, and from 69 to 75% in longer tests (184 h) using full-strength wastewater. The gas produced was up to 77+/-11% hydrogen, with overall recoveries of up to 28+/-6% of the COD in the wastewater as hydrogen gas. Methane was also produced at a maximum of 13+/-4% of total gas volume. The efficiency of hydrogen production, based on the electrical energy needed (but excluding the energy in the wastewater) compared to the energy of the hydrogen gas produced, was as high as 190+/-39% in 42-h batch tests with undiluted wastewater, but was lower in longer batch tests of 184 h (91+/-6%). Hydrogen gas could not be recovered in fermentation tests using wastewater with a heat-treated inoculum. Hydrogen production was shown to be possible by fermentation when the wastewater was sterilized, but this process would not be practical or energy efficient. We therefore conclude from these tests that MECs are an effective method for hydrogen recovery from swine wastewater treatment, although the process needs to be further evaluated for reducing methane production, increasing the efficiency of converting the organic matter into current, and increasing recovery of hydrogen gas produced at the cathode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19138783     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  13 in total

Review 1.  Microbial fuel cells and microbial ecology: applications in ruminant health and production research.

Authors:  Orianna Bretschger; Jason B Osterstock; William E Pinchak; Shun'ichi Ishii; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Bioelectrochemical anaerobic sewage treatment technology for Arctic communities.

Authors:  Boris Tartakovsky; Yehuda Kleiner; Michelle-France Manuel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Swine manure valorization in fabrication of nutrition and energy.

Authors:  Abdulmoseen Segun Giwa; Nasir Ali; Muhammad Asif
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Degradation of organics extracted from dewatered sludge by alkaline pretreatment in microbial electrolysis cell.

Authors:  Kai Hu; Lan Xu; Wei Chen; Shuo-Qiu Jia; Wei Wang; Feng Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Hydrogen production by geobacter species and a mixed consortium in a microbial electrolysis cell.

Authors:  Douglas F Call; Rachel C Wagner; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Biohydrogen production: strategies to improve process efficiency through microbial routes.

Authors:  Kuppam Chandrasekhar; Yong-Jik Lee; Dong-Woo Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Microbial electron transport and energy conservation - the foundation for optimizing bioelectrochemical systems.

Authors:  Frauke Kracke; Igor Vassilev; Jens O Krömer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  The presence of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the inoculum improves methane gas production in microbial electrolysis cells.

Authors:  Michael Siegert; Xiu-Fen Li; Matthew D Yates; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effects of Applied Potential and Reactants to Hydrogen-Producing Biocathode in a Microbial Electrolysis Cell.

Authors:  Swee Su Lim; Byung Hong Kim; Da Li; Yujie Feng; Wan Ramli Wan Daud; Keith Scott; Eileen Hao Yu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  Ammonium Recovery and Biogas Upgrading in a Tubular Micro-Pilot Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC).

Authors:  Lorenzo Cristiani; Marco Zeppilli; Cristina Porcu; Mauro Majone
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.