Literature DB >> 21075886

Influence of external resistance on electrogenesis, methanogenesis, and anode prokaryotic communities in microbial fuel cells.

Sokhee Jung1, John M Regan.   

Abstract

The external resistance (R(ext)) of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) regulates both the anode availability as an electron acceptor and the electron flux through the circuit. We evaluated the effects of R(ext) on MFCs using acetate or glucose. The average current densities (I) ranged from 40.5 mA/m(2) (9,800 Ω) to 284.5 mA/m(2) (150 Ω) for acetate-fed MFCs (acetate-fed reactors [ARs]), with a corresponding anode potential (E(an)) range of -188 to -4 mV (versus a standard hydrogen electrode [SHE]). For glucose-fed MFCs (glucose-fed reactors [GRs]), I ranged from 40.0 mA/m(2) (9,800 Ω) to 273.0 mA/m(2) (150 Ω), with a corresponding E(an) range of -189 to -7 mV. ARs produced higher Coulombic efficiencies and energy efficiencies than GRs over all tested R(ext) levels because of electron and potential losses from glucose fermentation. Biogas production accounted for 14 to 18% of electron flux in GRs but only 0 to 6% of that in ARs. GRs produced similar levels of methane, regardless of the R(ext). However, total methane production in ARs increased as R(ext) increased, suggesting that E(an) might influence the competition for substrates between exoelectrogens and methanogens in ARs. An increase of R(ext) to 9,800 Ω significantly changed the anode bacterial communities for both ARs and GRs, while operating at 970 Ω and 150 Ω had little effect. Deltaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the major groups found in anode communities in ARs and GRs. Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were found only in ARs. Bacilli were abundant only in GRs. The anode-methanogenic communities were dominated by Methanosaetaceae, with significantly lower numbers of Methanomicrobiales. These results show that R(ext) affects not only the E(an) and current generation but also the anode biofilm community and methanogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21075886      PMCID: PMC3020560          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01392-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  50 in total

1.  Growth kinetics and competition between Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta in mesophilic anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Anne Conklin; H David Stensel; John Ferguson
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.946

Review 2.  Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Bruce E Logan; John M Regan
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  Microbial ecology meets electrochemistry: electricity-driven and driving communities.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; Jorge Rodríguez; Linda L Blackall; Jurg Keller; Pamela Gross; Damien Batstone; Willy Verstraete; Kenneth H Nealson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Peter Aelterman; Stefano Freguia; Jurg Keller; Willy Verstraete; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Growth of Geobacter sulfurreducens under nutrient-limiting conditions in continuous culture.

Authors:  Abraham Esteve-Núñez; Mary Rothermich; Manju Sharma; Derek Lovley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  Selecting anode-respiring bacteria based on anode potential: phylogenetic, electrochemical, and microscopic characterization.

Authors:  César I Torres; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Prathap Parameswaran; Andrew Kato Marcus; Greg Wanger; Yuri A Gorby; Bruce E Rittmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Kinetic experiments for evaluating the Nernst-Monod model for anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) in a biofilm anode.

Authors:  César I Torres; Andrew Kato Marcus; Prathap Parameswaran; Bruce E Rittmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction by an electrochemically active lactic acid bacterium phylogenetically related to Enterococcus gallinarum isolated from submerged soil.

Authors:  G T Kim; M S Hyun; I S Chang; H J Kim; H S Park; B H Kim; S D Kim; J W T Wimpenny; A J Weightman
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Electron fluxes in a microbial fuel cell performing carbon and nitrogen removal.

Authors:  Bernardino Virdis; Korneel Rabaey; Zhiguo Yuan; René A Rozendal; Jürg Keller
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Characterization of metabolism in the Fe(III)-reducing organism Geobacter sulfurreducens by constraint-based modeling.

Authors:  R Mahadevan; D R Bond; J E Butler; A Esteve-Nuñez; M V Coppi; B O Palsson; C H Schilling; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  15 in total

1.  Assessment of microbial diversity bias associated with soil heterogeneity and sequencing resolution in pyrosequencing analyses.

Authors:  Sokhee P Jung; Hojeong Kang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Microbial population and functional dynamics associated with surface potential and carbon metabolism.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Shino Suzuki; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Tony Phan; Greg Wanger; Kenneth H Nealson; Yuji Sekiguchi; Yuri A Gorby; Orianna Bretschger
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Microbial community analysis in biocathode microbial fuel cells packed with different materials.

Authors:  Yanmei Sun; Jincheng Wei; Peng Liang; Xia Huang
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Presence of Selected Methanogens, Fibrolytic Bacteria, and Proteobacteria in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Neonatal Dairy Calves from Birth to 72 Hours.

Authors:  Cesar E Guzman; Lara T Bereza-Malcolm; Bert De Groef; Ashley E Franks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of Anode Potentials on Current Generation and Extracellular Electron Transfer Paths of Geobacter Species.

Authors:  Souichiro Kato
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Evaluation of limiting factors for current density in microbial electrochemical cells (MXCs) treating domestic wastewater.

Authors:  Bipro Ranjan Dhar; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2014-09-20

7.  Convergent development of anodic bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Matthew D Yates; Patrick D Kiely; Douglas F Call; Hamid Rismani-Yazdi; Kyle Bibby; Jordan Peccia; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Characterization of anode and anolyte community growth and the impact of impedance in a microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Diana Sanchez-Herrera; Daniella Pacheco-Catalan; Ruby Valdez-Ojeda; Blondy Canto-Canche; Xochitl Dominguez-Benetton; Jorge Domínguez-Maldonado; Liliana Alzate-Gaviria
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.563

9.  Phylogenetic and metagenomic analyses of substrate-dependent bacterial temporal dynamics in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Husen Zhang; Xi Chen; Daniel Braithwaite; Zhen He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Set anode potentials affect the electron fluxes and microbial community structure in propionate-fed microbial electrolysis cells.

Authors:  Ananda Rao Hari; Krishna P Katuri; Bruce E Logan; Pascal E Saikaly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.