Literature DB >> 18564184

Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.

K P Nevin1, H Richter, S F Covalla, J P Johnson, T L Woodard, A L Orloff, H Jia, M Zhang, D R Lovley.   

Abstract

It has been previously noted that mixed communities typically produce more power in microbial fuel cells than pure cultures. If true, this has important implications for the design of microbial fuel cells and for studying the process of electron transfer on anode biofilms. To further evaluate this, Geobacter sulfurreducens was grown with acetate as fuel in a continuous flow 'ministack' system in which the carbon cloth anode and cathode were positioned in close proximity, and the cation-selective membrane surface area was maximized in order to overcome some of the electrochemical limitations that were inherent in fuel cells previously employed for the study of pure cultures. Reducing the size of the anode in order to eliminate cathode limitation resulted in maximum current and power densities per m(2) of anode surface of 4.56 A m(-2) and 1.88 W m(-2) respectively. Electron recovery as current from acetate oxidation was c. 100% when oxygen diffusion into the system was minimized. This performance is comparable to the highest levels previously reported for mixed communities in similar microbial fuel cells and slightly higher than the power output of an anaerobic sludge inoculum in the same ministack system. Minimizing the volume of the anode chamber yielded a volumetric power density of 2.15 kW m(-3), which is the highest power density per volume yet reported for a microbial fuel cell. Geobacter sulfurreducens formed relatively uniform biofilms 3-18 mum thick on the carbon cloth anodes. When graphite sticks served as the anode, the current density (3.10 A m(-2)) was somewhat less than with the carbon cloth anodes, but the biofilms were thicker (c. 50 mum) with a more complex pillar and channel structure. These results suggest that the previously observed disparity in power production in pure and mixed culture microbial fuel cell systems can be attributed more to differences in the fuel cell designs than to any inherent superior capability of mixed cultures to produce more power than pure cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18564184     DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01675.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  77 in total

1.  Two isoforms of Geobacter sulfurreducens PilA have distinct roles in pilus biogenesis, cytochrome localization, extracellular electron transfer, and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Lubna V Richter; Steven J Sandler; Robert M Weis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Electrical conductivity in a mixed-species biofilm.

Authors:  Nikhil S Malvankar; Joanne Lau; Kelly P Nevin; Ashley E Franks; Mark T Tuominen; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Structural and operational complexity of the Geobacter sulfurreducens genome.

Authors:  Yu Qiu; Byung-Kwan Cho; Young Seoub Park; Derek Lovley; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Karsten Zengler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  In situ to in silico and back: elucidating the physiology and ecology of Geobacter spp. using genome-scale modelling.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 5.  Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Comparison of electrode reduction activities of Geobacter sulfurreducens and an enriched consortium in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Kazuya Watanabe; Soichi Yabuki; Bruce E Logan; Yuji Sekiguchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Tunable metallic-like conductivity in microbial nanowire networks.

Authors:  Nikhil S Malvankar; Madeline Vargas; Kelly P Nevin; Ashley E Franks; Ching Leang; Byoung-Chan Kim; Kengo Inoue; Tünde Mester; Sean F Covalla; Jessica P Johnson; Vincent M Rotello; Mark T Tuominen; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Evidence for direct electron transfer by a gram-positive bacterium isolated from a microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  K C Wrighton; J C Thrash; R A Melnyk; J P Bigi; K G Byrne-Bailey; J P Remis; D Schichnes; M Auer; C J Chang; J D Coates
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  DIFFUSION IN BIOFILMS RESPIRING ON ELECTRODES.

Authors:  Rs Renslow; Jt Babauta; Pd Majors; H Beyenal
Journal:  Energy Environ Sci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 38.532

10.  Initial development and structure of biofilms on microbial fuel cell anodes.

Authors:  Suzanne T Read; Paritam Dutta; Phillip L Bond; Jürg Keller; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.