Literature DB >> 22610438

Enrichment of microbial electrolysis cell biocathodes from sediment microbial fuel cell bioanodes.

John M Pisciotta1, Zehra Zaybak, Douglas F Call, Joo-Youn Nam, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

Electron-accepting (electrotrophic) biocathodes were produced by first enriching graphite fiber brush electrodes as the anodes in sediment-type microbial fuel cells (sMFCs) using two different marine sediments and then electrically inverting the anodes to function as cathodes in two-chamber bioelectrochemical systems (BESs). Electron consumption occurred at set potentials of -439 mV and -539 mV (versus the potential of a standard hydrogen electrode) but not at -339 mV in minimal media lacking organic sources of energy. Results at these different potentials were consistent with separate linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) scans that indicated enhanced activity (current consumption) below only ca. -400 mV. MFC bioanodes not originally acclimated at a set potential produced electron-accepting (electrotrophic) biocathodes, but bioanodes operated at a set potential (+11 mV) did not. CO(2) was removed from cathode headspace, indicating that the electrotrophic biocathodes were autotrophic. Hydrogen gas generation, followed by loss of hydrogen gas and methane production in one sample, suggested hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. There was abundant microbial growth in the biocathode chamber, as evidenced by an increase in turbidity and the presence of microorganisms on the cathode surface. Clone library analysis of 16S rRNA genes indicated prominent sequences most similar to those of Eubacterium limosum (Butyribacterium methylotrophicum), Desulfovibrio sp. A2, Rhodococcus opacus, and Gemmata obscuriglobus. Transfer of the suspension to sterile cathodes made of graphite plates, carbon rods, or carbon brushes in new BESs resulted in enhanced current after 4 days, demonstrating growth by these microbial communities on a variety of cathode substrates. This report provides a simple and effective method for enriching autotrophic electrotrophs by the use of sMFCs without the need for set potentials, followed by the use of potentials more negative than -400 mV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610438      PMCID: PMC3416445          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00480-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

Review 1.  Microbial electrosynthesis - revisiting the electrical route for microbial production.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; René A Rozendal
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Optimal set anode potentials vary in bioelectrochemical systems.

Authors:  Rachel C Wagner; Douglas F Call; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  A role for microbial palladium nanoparticles in extracellular electron transfer.

Authors:  Xuee Wu; Feng Zhao; Nelli Rahunen; John R Varcoe; Claudio Avignone-Rossa; Alfred E Thumser; Robert C T Slade
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  K P Nevin; H Richter; S F Covalla; J P Johnson; T L Woodard; A L Orloff; H Jia; M Zhang; D R Lovley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 5.  Electricity-mediated biological hydrogen production.

Authors:  Jeanine S Geelhoed; Hubertus V M Hamelers; Alfons J M Stams
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 7.934

6.  Electricity generation from cysteine in a microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Bruce E Logan; Cassandro Murano; Keith Scott; Neil D Gray; Ian M Head
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Hydrogen production with a microbial biocathode.

Authors:  René A Rozendal; Adriaan W Jeremiasse; Hubertus V M Hamelers; Cees J N Buisman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane.

Authors:  Douglas Call; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  An MEC-MFC-coupled system for biohydrogen production from acetate.

Authors:  Min Sun; Guo-Ping Sheng; Lei Zhang; Chang-Rong Xia; Zhe-Xuan Mu; Xian-Wei Liu; Hua-Lin Wang; Han-Qing Yu; Rong Qi; Tao Yu; Min Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Reductive dechlorination of 2-chlorophenol by Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans with an electrode serving as the electron donor.

Authors:  Sarah M Strycharz; Sarah M Gannon; Amber R Boles; Ashley E Franks; Kelly P Nevin; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.541

View more
  19 in total

1.  Dynamics of cathode-associated microbial communities and metabolite profiles in a glycerol-fed bioelectrochemical system.

Authors:  Paul G Dennis; Falk Harnisch; Yun Kit Yeoh; Gene W Tyson; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Bio-electrochemical synthesis of commodity chemicals by autotrophic acetogens utilizing CO2 for environmental remediation.

Authors:  Gugan Jabeen; Robina Farooq
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Electrosynthesis of commodity chemicals by an autotrophic microbial community.

Authors:  Christopher W Marshall; Daniel E Ross; Erin B Fichot; R Sean Norman; Harold D May
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Isolation of acetogenic bacteria that induce biocorrosion by utilizing metallic iron as the sole electron donor.

Authors:  Souichiro Kato; Isao Yumoto; Yoichi Kamagata
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Cable bacteria extend the impacts of elevated dissolved oxygen into anoxic sediments.

Authors:  Feifei Liu; Zhenyu Wang; Bo Wu; Jesper T Bjerg; Wenzhe Hu; Xue Guo; Jun Guo; Lars Peter Nielsen; Rongliang Qiu; Meiying Xu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Enhancement of electricity production by graphene oxide in soil microbial fuel cells and plant microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Yuko Goto; Naoko Yoshida; Yuto Umeyama; Takeshi Yamada; Ryugo Tero; Akira Hiraishi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Bidirectional electroactive microbial biofilms and the role of biogenic sulfur in charge storage and release.

Authors:  Paniz Izadi; Marten Niklas Gey; Nicolas Schlüter; Uwe Schröder
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-07

8.  Cultivation of an obligate Fe(II)-oxidizing lithoautotrophic bacterium using electrodes.

Authors:  Zarath M Summers; Jeffrey A Gralnick; Daniel R Bond
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Pyrosequencing Reveals a Core Community of Anodic Bacterial Biofilms in Bioelectrochemical Systems from China.

Authors:  Yong Xiao; Yue Zheng; Song Wu; En-Hua Zhang; Zheng Chen; Peng Liang; Xia Huang; Zhao-Hui Yang; I-Son Ng; Bor-Yann Chen; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Microbial community in microbial fuel cell (MFC) medium and effluent enriched with purple photosynthetic bacterium (Rhodopseudomonas sp.).

Authors:  Tae-Jin Park; Weijun Ding; Shaoan Cheng; Manreetpal Singh Brar; Angel Po Yee Ma; Hein Min Tun; Frederick C Leung
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.