Literature DB >> 19815781

Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Elinor McKone1, Galit Yovel.   

Abstract

Classically, it has been presumed that picture-plane inversion primarily reduces sensitivity to spacing/configural information in faces (distance between location of the major features) and has little effect on sensitivity to local feature information (e.g., eye shape or color). Here, we review 22 published studies relevant to this claim. Data show that the feature inversion effect varied substantially across studies as a function of the following factors: whether the feature change was shape only or included color/brightness, the number of faces in the stimulus set, and whether the feature was in facial context. For shape-only changes in facial context, feature inversion effects were as large as typical spacing inversion effects. Small feature inversion effects occurred only when a task could be efficiently solved by visual-processing areas outside whole-face coding. The results argue that holistic/configural processing for upright faces integrates exact feature shape and spacing between blobs. We describe two plausible approaches to this process.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815781     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  59 in total

1.  When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Authors:  H Leder; V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

2.  Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Charles Collin; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-10

3.  Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

4.  Face-specific configural processing of relational information.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2006-02

5.  Becoming a face expert.

Authors:  Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer; Sara Ahola
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-11

6.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The development of expert face processing: are infants sensitive to normal differences in second-order relational information?

Authors:  Angela Hayden; Ramesh S Bhatt; Andrea Reed; Christine R Corbly; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2007-03-06

8.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces.

Authors:  Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition.

Authors:  William G Hayward; Gillian Rhodes; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-23
View more
  67 in total

1.  Holistic processing does not require configural variability.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Alison Harris; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A feature-inversion effect: can an isolated feature show behavior like the face-inversion effect?

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

4.  Neural mechanisms of object-based attention.

Authors:  Elias H Cohen; Frank Tong
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Effects of visual expertise on a novel eye-size illusion: implications for holistic face processing.

Authors:  Genyue Fu; Yan Dong; Paul C Quinn; Wen S Xiao; Qiandong Wang; Guowei Chen; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Stefanie Peykarjou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.203

8.  Are Faces Special to Infants? An Investigation of Configural and Featural Processing for the Upper and Lower Regions of Houses in 3- to 7-month-olds.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn; James W Tanaka; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-01-30

9.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

10.  Inversion effects in face-selective cortex with combinations of face parts.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Lindsay R Arcurio; Jason M Gold
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.