Literature DB >> 16464285

Face-specific configural processing of relational information.

Helmut Leder1, Claus-Christian Carbon.   

Abstract

Face processing relies on configural processing, which is thought to be particularly disrupted by inversion. We compared inversion effects in recognition experiments for three types of stimuli, using faces (Experiment 1) and houses (Experiment 2). Stimuli varied by their colour only (colour), by the spatial relations between components (relational), or by the components themselves (eyes, mouths, doors). For faces, relational versions revealed strong inversion effects, component versions moderate, and colour versions no inversion effect. Recognition of houses revealed no inversion effects at all. We suggest that the inversion effects observed for faces in the component condition are due to relational changes, which must accompany any change in components. This proposal may account for the rather inconsistent effects of inversion reported in the literature. Furthermore, we suggest configural processing seems to be somehow face-specific.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16464285     DOI: 10.1348/000712605X54794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  25 in total

1.  Perceptual specialization and configural face processing in infancy.

Authors:  Nicole Zieber; Ashley Kangas; Alyson Hock; Angela Hayden; Rebecca Collins; Henrietta Bada; Jane E Joseph; Ramesh S Bhatt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08-28

2.  A feature-inversion effect: can an isolated feature show behavior like the face-inversion effect?

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 3.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

4.  Explaining the face-inversion effect: the face-scheme incompatibility (FSI) model.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

5.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Discrimination and recognition of faces with changed configuration.

Authors:  Adam Sandford; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

7.  Task effects, performance levels, features, configurations, and holistic face processing: a reply to Rossion.

Authors:  Maximilian Riesenhuber; Brian S Wolff
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-08-07

8.  The effects of face inversion on perceiving- and sensing-based change detection.

Authors:  Robin I Goodrich; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-05-13

9.  Configural and featural processing in humans with congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Jens Bölte; Fred W Mast; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-07-01

10.  The part task of the part-spacing paradigm is not a pure measurement of part-based information of faces.

Authors:  Qi Zhu; Xiaobai Li; Kari Chow; Jia Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.