Literature DB >> 23066732

Inversion effects in face-selective cortex with combinations of face parts.

Thomas W James1, Lindsay R Arcurio, Jason M Gold.   

Abstract

The face inversion effect has been used as a basis for claims about the specialization of face-related perceptual and neural processes. One of these claims is that the fusiform face area (FFA) is the site of face-specific feature-based and/or configural/holistic processes that are responsible for producing the face inversion effect. However, the studies on which these claims were based almost exclusively used stimulus manipulations of whole faces. Here, we tested inversion effects using single, discrete features and combinations of multiple discrete features, in addition to whole faces, using both behavioral and fMRI measurements. In agreement with previous studies, we found behavioral inversion effects with whole faces and no inversion effects with a single eye stimulus or the two eyes in combination. However, we also found behavioral inversion effects with feature combination stimuli that included features in the top and bottom halves (eyes-mouth and eyes-nose-mouth). Activation in the FFA showed an inversion effect for the whole-face stimulus only, which did not match the behavioral pattern. Instead, a pattern of activation consistent with the behavior was found in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, which is a component of the extended face-preferring network. The results appear inconsistent with claims that the FFA is the site of face-specific feature-based and/or configural/holistic processes that are responsible for producing the face inversion effect. They are more consistent with claims that the FFA shows a stimulus preference for whole upright faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066732      PMCID: PMC3740542          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  36 in total

1.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  High-resolution imaging of the fusiform face area (FFA) using multivariate non-linear classifiers shows diagnosticity for non-face categories.

Authors:  Stephen José Hanson; Arielle Schmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect.

Authors:  Galit Yovel; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Fabrizio Esposito; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Nancy Kanwisher; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses.

Authors:  Bertrand Thirion; Philippe Pinel; Sébastien Mériaux; Alexis Roche; Stanislas Dehaene; Jean-Baptiste Poline
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Let's face it: it's a cortical network.

Authors:  Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Is the fusiform face area specialized for faces, individuation, or expert individuation?

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Graham Byatt; Patricia T Michie; Aina Puce
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Alison Harris; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  A face is more than just the eyes, nose, and mouth: fMRI evidence that face-selective cortex represents external features.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Ethan J Morris; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Goedele Van Belle; Wim Vanduffel; Bruno Rossion; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Stimulus Dependent Dynamic Reorganization of the Human Face Processing Network.

Authors:  Gideon Rosenthal; Olaf Sporns; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Intracranial markers of conscious face perception in humans.

Authors:  Fabiano Baroni; Jochem van Kempen; Hiroto Kawasaki; Christopher K Kovach; Hiroyuki Oya; Matthew A Howard; Ralph Adolphs; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Position selectivity in face-sensitive visual cortex to facial and nonfacial stimuli: an fMRI study.

Authors:  David F Nichols; Lisa R Betts; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Altered topology of neural circuits in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Gideon Rosenthal; Michal Tanzer; Erez Simony; Uri Hasson; Marlene Behrmann; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Cortical Pathways or Mechanism in the Face Inversion Effect in Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Taiyong Bi; Qijie Kuang; Bei Zhang; Huawang Wu; Haijing Li; Bin Zhang; Jingping Zhao; Yuping Ning; Shenglin She; Yingjun Zheng
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.570

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.