Literature DB >> 19810785

Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration.

Ramakrishna Chakravarthi1, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Object recognition is a central function of the visual system. As a first step, the features of an object are registered; these independently encoded features are then bound together to form a single representation. Here we investigate the locus of this "feature integration" by examining crowding, a striking breakdown of this process. Crowding, an inability to identify a peripheral target surrounded by flankers, results from "excessive integration" of target and flanker features. We presented a standard crowding display with a target C flanked by four flanker C's in the periphery. We then masked only the flankers (but not the target) with one of three kinds of masks-noise, metacontrast, and object substitution-each of which interferes at progressively higher levels of visual processing. With noise and metacontrast masks (low-level masking), the crowded target was recovered, whereas with object substitution masks (high-level masking), it was not. This places a clear upper bound on the locus of interference in crowding suggesting that crowding is not a low-level phenomenon. We conclude that feature integration, which underlies crowding, occurs prior to the locus of object substitution masking. Further, our results indicate that the integrity of the flankers, but not their identification, is crucial for crowding to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19810785      PMCID: PMC2766569          DOI: 10.1167/9.10.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

1.  The neurophysiology of backward visual masking: information analysis.

Authors:  E T Rolls; M J Tovée; S Panzeri
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system.

Authors:  S L Macknik; M S Livingstone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  CONTOUR INTERACTION AND VISUAL RESOLUTION: CONTRALATERAL EFFECTS.

Authors:  M C FLOM; G G HEATH; E TAKAHASHI
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A model for visual memory tasks.

Authors:  G SPERLING
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1963-02       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Metacontrast.

Authors:  M ALPERN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1953-08

6.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Melanie Palomares; Najib J Majaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A model of visual backward masking.

Authors:  Guido Bugmann; John G Taylor
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; S Cobb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision.

Authors:  F L Kooi; A Toet; S P Tripathy; D M Levi
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1994
View more
  16 in total

1.  Visual crowding is correlated with awareness.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Visual masking by object substitution in schizophrenia.

Authors:  M F Green; J K Wynn; B Breitmeyer; K I Mathis; K H Nuechterlein
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 3.  Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution masking.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Jay Pratt; Paul E Dux; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

4.  Continuous flash suppression and monocular pattern masking impact subjective awareness similarly.

Authors:  J D Knotts; Hakwan Lau; Megan A K Peters
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Object crowding.

Authors:  Julian M Wallace; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Face features and face configurations both contribute to visual crowding.

Authors:  Hsin-Mei Sun; Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Unmasking saccadic uncrowding.

Authors:  Mehmet N Ağaoğlu; Haluk Öğmen; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Crowding by invisible flankers.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Uncovering foveal crowding?

Authors:  Maria Lev; Oren Yehezkel; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.