BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia patients demonstrate impairment on visual backward masking, a measure of early visual processing. Most visual masking paradigms involve two distinct processes, an early fast-acting component associated with object formation and a later component that acts through object substitution. So far, masking paradigms used in schizophrenia research have been unable to separate these two processes. METHOD: We administered three visual processing paradigms (location masking with forward and backward masking, four-dot backward masking and a cuing task) to 136 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 79 healthy controls. A psychophysical procedure was used to match subjects on identification of an unmasked target prior to location masking. Location masking interrupts object formation, four-dot masking task works through masking by object substitution and the cuing task measures iconic decay. RESULTS: Patients showed impairment on location masking after being matched for input threshold, similar to previous reports. After correcting for age, patients showed lower performance on four-dot masking than controls, but the groups did not differ on the cuing task. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with schizophrenia showed lower performance when masking was specific to object substitution. The difference in object substitution masking was not due to a difference in rate of iconic decay, which was comparable in the two groups. These results suggest that, despite normal iconic decay rates, individuals with schizophrenia show impairment in a paradigm of masking by object substitution that did not also involve disruption of object formation.
BACKGROUND:Schizophreniapatients demonstrate impairment on visual backward masking, a measure of early visual processing. Most visual masking paradigms involve two distinct processes, an early fast-acting component associated with object formation and a later component that acts through object substitution. So far, masking paradigms used in schizophrenia research have been unable to separate these two processes. METHOD: We administered three visual processing paradigms (location masking with forward and backward masking, four-dot backward masking and a cuing task) to 136 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 79 healthy controls. A psychophysical procedure was used to match subjects on identification of an unmasked target prior to location masking. Location masking interrupts object formation, four-dot masking task works through masking by object substitution and the cuing task measures iconic decay. RESULTS:Patients showed impairment on location masking after being matched for input threshold, similar to previous reports. After correcting for age, patients showed lower performance on four-dot masking than controls, but the groups did not differ on the cuing task. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with schizophrenia showed lower performance when masking was specific to object substitution. The difference in object substitution masking was not due to a difference in rate of iconic decay, which was comparable in the two groups. These results suggest that, despite normal iconic decay rates, individuals with schizophrenia show impairment in a paradigm of masking by object substitution that did not also involve disruption of object formation.
Authors: Michael F Green; David Glahn; Stephen A Engel; Keith H Nuechterlein; Fred Sabb; Magda Strojwas; Mark S Cohen Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Jonathan K Wynn; Gregory A Light; Bruno Breitmeyer; Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Michael Foster Green; Jim Mintz; Dustin Salveson; Keith H Nuechterlein; Bruno Breitmeyer; Gregory A Light; David L Braff Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Junghee Lee; Mark S Cohen; Stephen A Engel; David Glahn; Keith H Nuechterlein; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Kristopher I Mathis; Jonathan K Wynn; Bruno Breitmeyer; Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Carol Jahshan; Jonathan K Wynn; Amanda McCleery; David C Glahn; Lori L Altshuler; Michael F Green Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 4.791