Literature DB >> 23417271

Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution masking.

Stephanie C Goodhew1, Jay Pratt, Paul E Dux, Susanne Ferber.   

Abstract

Object substitution masking (OSM) occurs when a sparse (e.g., four-dot), temporally trailing mask obscures the visibility of a briefly presented target. Here, we review theories of OSM: those that propose that OSM reflects the interplay between feedforward and feedback/reentrant neural processes, those that predict that feedforward processing alone gives rise to the phenomenon, and theories that focus on cognitive explanations, such as object updating. We discuss how each of these theories accommodates key findings from the OSM literature. In addition, we examine the relationship between OSM and other visual-cognitive phenomena, including object correspondence through occlusion, change blindness, metacontrast masking, backward masking, and visual short-term memory. Finally, we examine the level of processing at which OSM impairs target perception. Collectively, OSM appears to reflect the conditions under which the brain confuses two visual events for one when they are encoded with low spatiotemporal resolution, due to processing resources being otherwise occupied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417271     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0400-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  104 in total

1.  Understanding recovery from object substitution masking.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Paul E Dux; Ottmar V Lipp; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-12-10

2.  Delayed reentrant processing impairs visual awareness: an object-substitution-masking study.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Troy A W Visser; Stephanie C Goodhew; Ottmar V Lipp
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-08-09

3.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Looking back: corticothalamic feedback and early visual processing.

Authors:  Javier Cudeiro; Adam M Sillito
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Recovery from object substitution masking induced by transient suppression of visual motion processing: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Hirose; Ken Kihara; Tatsuya Mima; Yoshino Ueki; Hidenao Fukuyama; Naoyuki Osaka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The attentional requirements of consciousness.

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Patrick Cavanagh; Marvin M Chun; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Evidence for an integration theory of visual masking.

Authors:  M Coltheart; B Arthur
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-02
View more
  14 in total

1.  Contributions of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways to visual perception near the hands are not fixed, but can be dynamically altered.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Ruby Clarke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  Object-substitution masking degrades the quality of conscious object representations.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Harrison; Jason Rajsic; Daryl E Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

3.  The effect of SNARC compatibility on perceptual accuracy: evidence from object substitution masking.

Authors:  Greg Huffman; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-12

4.  Neural substrates of visual masking by object substitution in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Junghee Lee; Mark S Cohen; Stephen A Engel; David Glahn; Keith H Nuechterlein; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Tuning perception: Visual working memory biases the quality of visual awareness.

Authors:  Christine M Salahub; Stephen M Emrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

6.  The nature of altered vision near the hands: evidence for the magnocellular enhancement account from object correspondence through occlusion.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Nicole Fogel; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

7.  How action influences object perception.

Authors:  David Chan; Mary A Peterson; Morgan D Barense; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22

8.  The fastest saccadic responses escape visual masking.

Authors:  Sébastien M Crouzet; Morten Overgaard; Niko A Busch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Probing feedforward and feedback contributions to awareness with visual masking and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-21

10.  A closer look at four-dot masking of a foveated target.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.