Literature DB >> 7800040

Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking.

V S Ramachandran1, S Cobb.   

Abstract

How does the human visual system 'bind' different fragments in the visual scene to create enduring representations of objects? A visual illusion known as 'metacontrast' or backward masking provides compelling evidence that perception is not instantaneous and that it occurs sequentially in distinct stages. If a solid white target square is displayed for 50 ms in a tachistoscope, switched off, and followed by a 50 ms display of two flanking mask squares, remarkably, subjects report seeing only the two flanking squares: the first square is simply not 'seen'. By plotting the magnitude of masking as a function of the delay between the target and mask (the stimulus onset asynchrony), one can obtain a characteristic 'U'-shaped function with optimum masking occurring at about 50 ms, and no masking with synchronous target and mask presentations or at delays higher than 300 ms. The illusion is also highly sensitive to elementary stimulus dimensions such as colour, orientation and spatial frequency, and it has been suggested that it is based on 'low level' autonomous visual mechanisms rather than cognitive processes. Here we describe a novel visual stimulus that demonstrates that metacontrast can be strongly modulated by 'top down' influence such as voluntary visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7800040     DOI: 10.1038/373066a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

1.  Seeing properties of an invisible object: feature inheritance and shine-through.

Authors:  M H Herzog; C Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking.

Authors:  S L Macknik; S Martinez-Conde; M M Haglund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Warning: attending to a mask may be hazardous to your perception.

Authors:  Mathew S Tata; Deborah E Giaschi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

4.  Lateral masking in cycling displays: the relative importance of separation, flanker duration, and interstimulus interval for object-mediated updating.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Revisiting the backward masking deficit in schizophrenia: individual differences in performance and modeling with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Bruce Luber; Arielle D Stanford; Dolores Malaspina; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Perceptual grouping impairs temporal resolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Nicol; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Pupillometric measures of attentional allocation to target and mask processing on the backward masking task in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Eric Granholm; Scott C Fish; Steven P Verney
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Automatic frame-centered object representation and integration revealed by iconic memory, visual priming, and backward masking.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Preserved subliminal processing and impaired conscious access in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Antoine Del Cul; Stanislas Dehaene; Marion Leboyer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12

10.  Binding binding: Departure points for a different version of the perceptual retouch theory.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.