Literature DB >> 10402257

The neurophysiology of backward visual masking: information analysis.

E T Rolls1, M J Tovée, S Panzeri.   

Abstract

Backward masking can potentially provide evidence of the time needed for visual processing, a fundamental constraint that must be incorporated into computational models of vision. Although backward masking has been extensively used psychophysically, there is little direct evidence for the effects of visual masking on neuronal responses. To investigate the effects of a backward masking paradigm on the responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex, we have shown that the response of the neurons is interrupted by the mask. Under conditions when humans can just identify the stimulus, with stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) of 20 msec, neurons in macaques respond to their best stimulus for approximately 30 msec. We now quantify the information that is available from the responses of single neurons under backward masking conditions when two to six faces were shown. We show that the information available is greatly decreased as the mask is brought closer to the stimulus. The decrease is more marked than the decrease in firing rate because it is the selective part of the firing that is especially attenuated by the mask, not the spontaneous firing, and also because the neuronal response is more variable at short SOAs. However, even at the shortest SOA of 20 msec, the information available is on average 0.1 bits. This compares to 0.3 bits with only the 16-msec target stimulus shown and a typical value for such neurons of 0.4 to 0.5 bits with a 500-msec stimulus. The results thus show that considerable information is available from neuronal responses even under backward masking conditions that allow the neurons to have their main response in 30 msec. This provides evidence for how rapid the processing of visual information is in a cortical area and provides a fundamental constraint for understanding how cortical information processing operates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10402257     DOI: 10.1162/089892999563409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  41 in total

1.  Mapping the time course of nonconscious and conscious perception of fear: an integration of central and peripheral measures.

Authors:  Leanne M Williams; Belinda J Liddell; Jennifer Rathjen; Kerri J Brown; Jeffrey Gray; Mary Phillips; Andy Young; Evian Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Continuous detection of weak sensory signals in afferent spike trains: the role of anti-correlated interspike intervals in detection performance.

Authors:  J B M Goense; R Ratnam
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Deontological and altruistic guilt: evidence for distinct neurobiological substrates.

Authors:  Barbara Basile; Francesco Mancini; Emiliano Macaluso; Carlo Caltagirone; Richard S J Frackowiak; Marco Bozzali
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Neural attractor dynamics in object recognition.

Authors:  Valentina Daelli; Alessandro Treves
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neuroimaging evidence for object model verification theory: Role of prefrontal control in visual object categorization.

Authors:  Giorgio Ganis; Haline E Schendan; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The dynamics of categorization: Unraveling rapid categorization.

Authors:  Michael L Mack; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-05-04

9.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.