Literature DB >> 19776002

CTV to PTV margins for prostate irradiation. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of interfraction uncertainties using portal imaging and serial CT scans.

Luis A Pérez-Romasanta1, Eva Lozano-Martín, Joaquín Velasco-Jiménez, Fermín Mendicote-León, Miguel Sanz-Martín, Javier Torres-Donaire, Carmen Carrascosa-Fernández, Juan Carlos Zapata-Jimínez, Jacinto Arjona-Gutiérrez, Antonio Gil-Agudo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the magnitude of setup and organ motion errors from a subset of prostate cancer patients treated with conventional conformal radiotherapy, and to estimate the CTV-PTV margin according to published margin recipes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty prostate cancer patients were treated with external radiotherapy using electronic portal images (EPIs). Weekly treatment EPIs and pelvic CT scans were obtained. These data allowed interfractional analysis of prostate centre of mass motion and setup error. The margins needed to compensate these uncertainties were calculated.
RESULTS: Tattoo localisation requires a margin of 9-10.5 mm (LR), 15.2-17.8 mm (anterior-posterior (AP)) and 10.6-12.4 mm (superior-inferior (S-I)). Systematic displacements due to prostatic motion, with standard deviations of 2.4 mm (LR), 4.2 mm (AP) and 3.1 mm (S-I) were found to be larger than setup errors (1.8, 3.0 and 1.7 mm respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Customised PTV margin definition has been possible through in-house measurements of geometrical clinical uncertainties involved in the conventional conformal radiotherapy process. Uncertainty measurements in our department have proved to be larger than those used in common practice. Additional margin reduction procedures are needed in order to accomplish conformal radiotherapy goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19776002     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-009-0413-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  20 in total

1.  Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.

Authors:  J C Stroom; H C de Boer; H Huizenga; A G Visser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report.

Authors:  Joep C Stroom; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Target position variability throughout prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  L A Dawson; K Mah; E Franssen; G Morton
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch.

Authors:  W De Neve; F Van den Heuvel; M De Beukeleer; M Coghe; L Thon; P De Roover; M Van Lancker; G Storme
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Interfractional prostate shifts: review of 1870 computed tomography (CT) scans obtained during image-guided radiotherapy using CT-on-rails for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  James R Wong; Zhanrong Gao; Minoru Uematsu; Scott Merrick; Nolan P Machernis; Timothy Chen; Chee Wai Cheng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  What CTV-to-PTV margins should be applied for prostate irradiation? Four-dimensional quantitative assessment using model-based deformable image registration techniques.

Authors:  Gert J Meijer; Jeroen de Klerk; Karl Bzdusek; Hetty A van den Berg; Rogier Janssen; Michael R Kaus; Patrick Rodrigus; Peter-Paul van der Toorn
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning.

Authors:  C J Beard; P Kijewski; M Bussière; R Gelman; D Gladstone; K Shaffer; M Plunkett; P Castello; C N Coleman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging.

Authors:  A Bel; P H Vos; P T Rodrigus; C L Creutzberg; A G Visser; J C Stroom; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Three-dimensional analysis of delineation errors, setup errors, and organ motion during radiotherapy of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Gert J Meijer; Coen Rasch; Peter Remeijer; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility.

Authors:  J M Balter; K L Lam; H M Sandler; J F Littles; R L Bree; R K Ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  5 in total

1.  Uncertainties and CTV to PTV margins quantitative assessment using cone-beam CT technique in clinical application for prostate, and head and neck irradiation tumours.

Authors:  X J Juan-Senabre; J López-Tarjuelo; A Conde-Moreno; A Santos-Serra; A L Sánchez-Iglesias; J D Quirós-Higueras; N de Marco Blancas; S Calzada-Feliu; C Ferrer-Albiach
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Impact of different setup approaches in image-guided radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer: a study of 2940 setup deviations in 980 MVCTs.

Authors:  Kilian Schiller; Alessia Petrucci; Hans Geinitz; Tibor Schuster; Hanno Specht; Severin Kampfer; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Slav Yartsev; Glenn Bauman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Positioning error and expanding margins of planning target volume with kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Wen-Ling Wang; Yi-Qun Liu; Hong-Min Dong; Yin-Xiang Hu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part II of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.