PURPOSE: To quantify in three dimensions the geometric uncertainties of bladder irradiation (i.e., uncertainties in target delineation, organ motion, and patient setup). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pelvic CT images were obtained for 10 male bladder cancer patients. Apart from the initial planning CT scan, three follow-up scans were made for each of the patients. The bladder volumes in the planning CT scan were outlined by seven radiation oncologists. One observer also delineated the bladder volumes in the follow-up scans. Two-dimensional scalar maps of the interobserver variation and organ motion of the bladder surfaces were constructed. The setup errors were derived from the portal imaging results of the pooled group of bladder and prostate patients. RESULTS: All bladder volumes were consistently outlined by all observers. Generally small variations occurred (1.5-3 mm, 1 SD), although in 50% of the patients, larger discrepancies were observed in discriminating the bladder from the base of the prostate. Analysis of the portal imaging data showed setup errors of up to 3 mm (1 SD). Organ motion is the predominant geometric uncertainty in the radiotherapy process (5 mm, 1 SD, at the cranial side of the bladder), although 9 of 10 patients were able to preserve a fairly reproducible bladder volume during the complete treatment course. CONCLUSION: Anisotropic margins between the clinical target volume and planning target volume are needed in conformal radiotherapy of the bladder. Especially at the cranial side of the bladder, larger margins are needed because of the impact of bladder shape variation.
PURPOSE: To quantify in three dimensions the geometric uncertainties of bladder irradiation (i.e., uncertainties in target delineation, organ motion, and patient setup). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pelvic CT images were obtained for 10 male bladder cancerpatients. Apart from the initial planning CT scan, three follow-up scans were made for each of the patients. The bladder volumes in the planning CT scan were outlined by seven radiation oncologists. One observer also delineated the bladder volumes in the follow-up scans. Two-dimensional scalar maps of the interobserver variation and organ motion of the bladder surfaces were constructed. The setup errors were derived from the portal imaging results of the pooled group of bladder and prostatepatients. RESULTS: All bladder volumes were consistently outlined by all observers. Generally small variations occurred (1.5-3 mm, 1 SD), although in 50% of the patients, larger discrepancies were observed in discriminating the bladder from the base of the prostate. Analysis of the portal imaging data showed setup errors of up to 3 mm (1 SD). Organ motion is the predominant geometric uncertainty in the radiotherapy process (5 mm, 1 SD, at the cranial side of the bladder), although 9 of 10 patients were able to preserve a fairly reproducible bladder volume during the complete treatment course. CONCLUSION: Anisotropic margins between the clinical target volume and planning target volume are needed in conformal radiotherapy of the bladder. Especially at the cranial side of the bladder, larger margins are needed because of the impact of bladder shape variation.
Authors: Bongile Mzenda; Mir Hosseini-Ashrafi; Antony Palmer; Honghai Liu; David J Brown Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Luis A Pérez-Romasanta; Eva Lozano-Martín; Joaquín Velasco-Jiménez; Fermín Mendicote-León; Miguel Sanz-Martín; Javier Torres-Donaire; Carmen Carrascosa-Fernández; Juan Carlos Zapata-Jimínez; Jacinto Arjona-Gutiérrez; Antonio Gil-Agudo Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Jason A Efstathiou; Anthony L Zietman; Donald S Kaufman; Niall M Heney; John J Coen; William U Shipley Journal: World J Urol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Dominique C van Rooijen; René Pool; Jeroen B van de Kamer; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Caro C E Koning; Arjan Bel Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Adam D Melancon; Jennifer C O'Daniel; Lifei Zhang; Rajat J Kudchadker; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Rex M Cheung; Renaud de Crevoisier; Susan L Tucker; Wayne D Newhauser; Radhe Mohan; Lei Dong Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Dominique C van Rooijen; Jeroen B van de Kamer; René Pool; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Caro C E Koning; Arjan Bel Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 3.481