Literature DB >> 18786782

Interfractional prostate shifts: review of 1870 computed tomography (CT) scans obtained during image-guided radiotherapy using CT-on-rails for the treatment of prostate cancer.

James R Wong1, Zhanrong Gao, Minoru Uematsu, Scott Merrick, Nolan P Machernis, Timothy Chen, Chee Wai Cheng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review 1870 CT scans of interfractional prostate shift obtained during image-guided radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1870 pretreatment CT scans were acquired with CT-on-rails, and the corresponding shift data for 329 patients with prostate cancer were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 1870 scans reviewed, 44% required no setup adjustments in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction, 14% had shifts of 3-5 mm, 29% had shifts of 6-10 mm, and 13% had shifts of >10 mm. In the superior-inferior direction, 81% had no adjustments, 2% had shifts of 3-5 mm, 15% had shifts of 6-10 mm, and 2% had shifts of >10 mm. In the left-right direction, 65% had no adjustment, 13% had shifts of 3-5 mm, 17% had shifts of 6-10 mm, and 5% had shifts of >10 mm. Further analysis of the first 66 consecutive patients divided into three groups according to body mass index indicates that the shift in the AP direction for the overweight subgroup was statistically larger than those for the control and obese subgroups (p < 0.05). The interfractional shift in the lateral direction for the obese group (1 SD, 5.5 mm) was significantly larger than those for the overweight and control groups (4.1 and 2.9 mm, respectively) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that there is a significantly greater shift in the AP direction than in the lateral and superior-inferior directions for the entire patient group. Overweight and obese patient groups show a significant difference from the control group in terms of prostate shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18786782     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  CTV to PTV margins for prostate irradiation. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of interfraction uncertainties using portal imaging and serial CT scans.

Authors:  Luis A Pérez-Romasanta; Eva Lozano-Martín; Joaquín Velasco-Jiménez; Fermín Mendicote-León; Miguel Sanz-Martín; Javier Torres-Donaire; Carmen Carrascosa-Fernández; Juan Carlos Zapata-Jimínez; Jacinto Arjona-Gutiérrez; Antonio Gil-Agudo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Hashido; Shinya Nakasone; Mari Fukao; Seiichi Ota; Shinichi Inoue
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jason A Efstathiou; Gregory C Sharp; Hsiao-Ming Lu; I Frank Ciernik; Alexei V Trofimov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Interfractional variations in the setup of pelvic bony anatomy and soft tissue, and their implications on the delivery of proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Paul L Nguyen; Jason A Efstathiou; Yi Wang; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Martijn Engelsman; Scott Merrick; Chee-Wai Cheng; James R Wong; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Scanned ion beam therapy for prostate carcinoma: Comparison of single plan treatment and daily plan-adapted treatment.

Authors:  Sebastian Hild; Christian Graeff; Antoni Rucinski; Klemens Zink; Gregor Habl; Marco Durante; Klaus Herfarth; Christoph Bert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Target registration errors with surface imaging system in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: study on 19 patients.

Authors:  S Bartoncini; C Fiandra; M G Ruo Redda; S Allis; F Munoz; U Ricardi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Development of fast patient position verification software using 2D-3D image registration and its clinical experience.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Motoki Kumagai; Kentaro Miki; Riki Fukuhara; Hideaki Haneishi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Reproducibility of patient setup by surface image registration system in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marco Krengli; Simone Gaiano; Eleonora Mones; Andrea Ballarè; Debora Beldì; Cesare Bolchini; Gianfranco Loi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Comparison of User-Directed and Automatic Mapping of the Planned Isocenter to Treatment Space for Prostate IGRT.

Authors:  Zijie Xu; Ronald Chen; Andrew Wang; Andrea Kress; Mark Foskey; An Qin; Timothy Cullip; Gregg Tracton; Sha Chang; Joel Tepper; Di Yan; Edward Chaney
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-11-21

10.  Quantification and Assessment of Interfraction Setup Errors Based on Cone Beam CT and Determination of Safety Margins for Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Macarena Cubillos Mesías; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Johannes Thoelking; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Hansjoerg Wertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.