Literature DB >> 24811450

Frequency difference limens and auditory cue trading in CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Kelly E Radziwon1, Micheal L Dent2.   

Abstract

Mice are emerging as an important behavioral model for studies of auditory perception and acoustic communication. These mammals frequently produce ultrasonic vocalizations, although the details of how these vocalizations are used for communication are not entirely understood. An important step in determining how they might be differentiating their calls is to measure discrimination and identification of the dimensions of various acoustic stimuli. Here, behavioral operant conditioning methods were employed to assess frequency difference limens for pure tones. We found that their thresholds were similar to those in other rodents but higher than in humans. We also asked mice, in an identification paradigm, whether they would use frequency or duration differences to classify stimuli varying on those two dimensions. We found that the mice classified the stimuli based on frequency rather than duration.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBA/CaJ mice; Cue trading; Frequency difference limens; Mouse ultrasonic vocalizations; Operant conditioning; Psychoacoustics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24811450      PMCID: PMC4108501          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  9 in total

1.  Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

2.  Auditory filter shapes of CBA/CaJ mice: behavioral assessments.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Sarah Kimar; Cynthia A Prosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Ultrasonic emissions: do they facilitate courtship of mice.

Authors:  G Whitney; J R Coble; M D Stockton; E F Tilson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-09

4.  Behavioral measurements of absolute and frequency-difference thresholds in guinea pig.

Authors:  R Heffner; H Heffner; B Masterton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses.

Authors:  Q Y Zheng; K R Johnson; L C Erway
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Duration discrimination in the mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Behaviorally measured audiograms and gap detection thresholds in CBA/CaJ mice.

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Kristie M June; Daniel J Stolzberg; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Richard J Salvi; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Development of social vocalizations in mice.

Authors:  Jasmine M S Grimsley; Jessica J M Monaghan; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Discrimination of ultrasonic vocalizations by CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus) is related to spectrotemporal dissimilarity of vocalizations.

Authors:  Erikson G Neilans; David P Holfoth; Kelly E Radziwon; Christine V Portfors; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Audiograms, gap detection thresholds, and frequency difference limens in cannabinoid receptor 1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Katrina L Toal; Kelly E Radziwon; David P Holfoth; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Individual differences in food cue responsivity are associated with acute and repeated cocaine-induced vocalizations, but not cue-induced vocalizations.

Authors:  Jordan A Tripi; Micheal L Dent; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The effects of age and sex on the detection of pure tones by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps by mice.

Authors:  Laurel A Screven; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory Behavior in Adult-Blinded Mice.

Authors:  Ye-Hyun Kim; Katrina M Schrode; James Engel; Sergio Vicencio-Jimenez; Gabriela Rodriguez; Hey-Kyoung Lee; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-27

6.  Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.

Authors:  David P Holfoth; Erikson G Neilans; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Intensity difference limens in adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina L Toal; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Best sensitivity of temporal modulation transfer functions in laboratory mice matches the amplitude modulation embedded in vocalizations.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Atypical Social Development in Vasopressin-Deficient Brattleboro Rats.

Authors:  Matthew J Paul; Nicole V Peters; Mary K Holder; Anastasia M Kim; Jack Whylings; Joseph I Terranova; Geert J de Vries
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-04-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.