Literature DB >> 12583877

Gap detection in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus).

Eva Wagner1, Georg M Klump, Ingo Hamann.   

Abstract

Hearing thresholds for white-noise stimuli and temporal gap-detection thresholds in six Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) were determined in a GO/NOGO procedure using the method of constant stimuli. Gerbils were offspring of animals collected in the field and only bred in captivity for four generations or less. Hearing thresholds for 800 ms bursts of white noise ranged between -0.8 and 6.3 dB SPL. The median minimum-detectable gap centered in an 800 ms burst of white noise presented at 50 dB SPL was 2.1 ms. At levels of 40 dB SPL and above, gap-detection thresholds were independent of the sound-pressure level of the stimulus. At 30 dB SPL and below, the minimum-detectable gap increased with decreasing sound-pressure level. Near 5 dB sensation level, gap-detection thresholds ranged from 13.6 to 29.4 ms. The median threshold for the detection of gaps inserted 5 ms after the onset of an 800 ms burst of white noise of 50 dB SPL was 2.3 ms. The individuals' detection thresholds varied between 2.3 and 3.6 ms for stimuli in which the relative sound-pressure levels of the noise before and after the gap differed by up to 20 dB. The data found in the Mongolian gerbil match results from other mammal and bird species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12583877     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00643-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

Review 1.  The biological basis of audition.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Encoding of temporal features of auditory stimuli in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body and superior paraolivary nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  A Kadner; A S Berrebi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Brief Stimulus Exposure Fully Remediates Temporal Processing Deficits Induced by Early Hearing Loss.

Authors:  David B Green; Michelle M Mattingly; Yi Ye; Jennifer D Gay; Merri J Rosen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Audiograms, gap detection thresholds, and frequency difference limens in cannabinoid receptor 1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Katrina L Toal; Kelly E Radziwon; David P Holfoth; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The effects of aging and sex on detection of ultrasonic vocalizations by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Age-dependent changes of gap detection in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Ingo Hamann; Otto Gleich; Georg M Klump; Malte C Kittel; Jürgen Strutz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-16

7.  Behaviorally measured audiograms and gap detection thresholds in CBA/CaJ mice.

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Kristie M June; Daniel J Stolzberg; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Richard J Salvi; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Kelly Radziwon; Benjamin D Auerbach; Dalian Ding; Xiaopeng Liu; Guang-Di Chen; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Selective Interruption of Auditory Interhemispheric Cross Talk Impairs Discrimination Learning of Frequency-Modulated Tone Direction But Not Gap Detection and Discrimination.

Authors:  Katja Saldeitis; Marcus Jeschke; Annika Michalek; Julia U Henschke; Wolfram Wetzel; Frank W Ohl; Eike Budinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.709

10.  Salicylate-induced hearing loss and gap detection deficits in rats.

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Daniel J Stolzberg; Maxwell E Urban; Rachael A Bowler; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.