Literature DB >> 24632841

Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

Livia de Hoz1, Israel Nelken2.   

Abstract

When faced with sensory stimuli, an organism may be required to detect very small differences in a physical parameter (discrimination), while in other situations it may have to generalize over many possible values of the same physical parameter. This decision may be based both on learned information and on sensory aspects of perception. In the present study we describe frequency processing in the behaving mouse using both discrimination and generalization as two key aspects of behaviour. We used a novel naturalistic behavioural apparatus designed for mice, the Audiobox, and paradigm contingencies that were identical for both auditory discrimination and generalization, the latter measured using latent inhibition. Mice learned to discriminate between frequencies that were an octave apart in a single trial. They showed significant discrimination between tone frequencies that were as close as 4-7%, and had d' of about 1 for ΔF of around 10%. In contrast, pre-exposure frequencies that were half an octave or less below the conditioned tone elicited latent inhibition, showing a generalization bandwidth of at least half an octave. Thus, in the same apparatus and using the same general memory paradigm, mice showed generalization gradients that were considerably wider than their discrimination threshold, indicating that environmental requirements and previous experience can determine whether the same two frequencies will be considered same or different. Remarkably, generalization gradients paralleled the typical bandwidths established in the auditory periphery and midbrain, suggesting that frequencies may be considered similar when falling within the same critical band.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24632841      PMCID: PMC3954732          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  33 in total

1.  Negative valence widens generalization of learning.

Authors:  Eitan Schechtman; Offir Laufer; Rony Paz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Operant methods for mouse psychoacoustics.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Garnet Bendig; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-02

3.  Auditory discrimination learning and knowledge transfer in mice depends on task difficulty.

Authors:  Simone Kurt; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse.

Authors:  Lei Song; JoAnn McGee; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Age-related hearing loss in C57BL/6J mice has both frequency-specific and non-frequency-specific components that produce a hyperacusis-like exaggeration of the acoustic startle reflex.

Authors:  James R Ison; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-19

6.  Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Holger Dierker; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-10

7.  Analysis of environmental sound levels in modern rodent housing rooms.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Bradford J May; Ziwei Judy Hao; Julie Watson
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.625

8.  Early auditory enrichment with music enhances auditory discrimination learning and alters NR2B protein expression in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Liping Yu; Rui Cai; Jiping Zhang; Xinde Sun
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Behaviorally measured audiograms and gap detection thresholds in CBA/CaJ mice.

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Kristie M June; Daniel J Stolzberg; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Richard J Salvi; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Resolution in azimuth sound localization in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Julia K Maier; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Mice tune out not in: violation of prediction drives auditory saliency.

Authors:  Meike M Rogalla; Inga Rauser; Karsten Schulze; Lasse Osterhagen; K Jannis Hildebrandt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The Claustrum Supports Resilience to Distraction.

Authors:  Gal Atlan; Anna Terem; Noa Peretz-Rivlin; Kamini Sehrawat; Ben Jerry Gonzales; Guy Pozner; Gen-Ichi Tasaka; Yael Goll; Ron Refaeli; Ori Zviran; Byung Kook Lim; Maya Groysman; Inbal Goshen; Adi Mizrahi; Israel Nelken; Ami Citri
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Hair cell synaptic dysfunction, auditory fatigue and thermal sensitivity in otoferlin Ile515Thr mutants.

Authors:  Nicola Strenzke; Rituparna Chakrabarti; Hanan Al-Moyed; Alexandra Müller; Gerhard Hoch; Tina Pangrsic; Gulnara Yamanbaeva; Christof Lenz; Kuan-Ting Pan; Elisabeth Auge; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Henning Urlaub; Nils Brose; Carolin Wichmann; Ellen Reisinger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap).

Authors:  Reyhaneh Abbasi; Peter Balazs; Maria Adelaide Marconi; Doris Nicolakis; Sarah M Zala; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  Tcf4 transgenic female mice display delayed adaptation in an auditory latent inhibition paradigm.

Authors:  M M Brzózka; M J Rossner; L de Hoz
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Bidirectional Regulation of Innate and Learned Behaviors That Rely on Frequency Discrimination by Cortical Inhibitory Neurons.

Authors:  Mark Aizenberg; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; John J Briguglio; Ryan G Natan; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Automated Operant Conditioning in the Mouse Home Cage.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; Patrick O Kanold
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Training Rats Using Water Rewards Without Water Restriction.

Authors:  Pamela Reinagel
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Auditory midbrain coding of statistical learning that results from discontinuous sensory stimulation.

Authors:  Hugo Cruces-Solís; Zhizi Jing; Olga Babaev; Jonathan Rubin; Burak Gür; Dilja Krueger-Burg; Nicola Strenzke; Livia de Hoz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.