Valery A Danilack1, Anthony P Nunes2, Maureen G Phipps3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, and Division of Research, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI. Electronic address: valery_danilack@brown.edu. 2. Optum Epidemiology, Providence, RI. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, and Division of Research, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Determining appropriate sites of care for any type of medical issue assumes successful matching of patient risks to facility capabilities and resources. In obstetrics, predicting patients who will have a need for additional resources beyond routine obstetric and neonatal care is difficult. Women without prenatal risk factors and their newborns may experience unexpected complications during delivery or postpartum. In this study, we report the risk of unexpected maternal and newborn complications among pregnancies without identified prenatal risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional investigation utilizing US natality data to analyze 10 million birth certificate records from 2011 through 2013. We categorized pregnancies as low risk (no prenatal risk factors) or high risk (at least 1 prenatal risk factor) according to 19 demographic, medical, and pregnancy characteristics. We evaluated 21 individual unexpected or adverse intrapartum and postpartum outcomes in addition to a composite indicator of any adverse outcome. RESULTS: Among 10,458,616 pregnancies, 38% were identified as low risk and 62% were identified as high risk for unexpected complications. At least 1 unexpected complication was indicated on the birth certificate for 46% of all pregnancies, 29% of low-risk pregnancies, and 57% of high-risk pregnancies. While the risk for unexpected or adverse outcomes was greatly reduced for the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group overall and for several of the individual outcomes, low-risk pregnancies had higher risks of vacuum delivery, forceps delivery, meconium staining, and chorioamnionitis compared to high-risk pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Of births, 29% identified to be low risk had an unexpected complication that would require nonroutine obstetric or neonatal care. Additionally, for select outcomes, risks were higher in the low-risk group compared to the group with identified risk factors. This information is important for planning location of birth and evaluating birthing centers and hospitals for necessary resources to ensure quality care and patient safety.
OBJECTIVE: Determining appropriate sites of care for any type of medical issue assumes successful matching of patient risks to facility capabilities and resources. In obstetrics, predicting patients who will have a need for additional resources beyond routine obstetric and neonatal care is difficult. Women without prenatal risk factors and their newborns may experience unexpected complications during delivery or postpartum. In this study, we report the risk of unexpected maternal and newborn complications among pregnancies without identified prenatal risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional investigation utilizing US natality data to analyze 10 million birth certificate records from 2011 through 2013. We categorized pregnancies as low risk (no prenatal risk factors) or high risk (at least 1 prenatal risk factor) according to 19 demographic, medical, and pregnancy characteristics. We evaluated 21 individual unexpected or adverse intrapartum and postpartum outcomes in addition to a composite indicator of any adverse outcome. RESULTS: Among 10,458,616 pregnancies, 38% were identified as low risk and 62% were identified as high risk for unexpected complications. At least 1 unexpected complication was indicated on the birth certificate for 46% of all pregnancies, 29% of low-risk pregnancies, and 57% of high-risk pregnancies. While the risk for unexpected or adverse outcomes was greatly reduced for the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group overall and for several of the individual outcomes, low-risk pregnancies had higher risks of vacuum delivery, forceps delivery, meconium staining, and chorioamnionitis compared to high-risk pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Of births, 29% identified to be low risk had an unexpected complication that would require nonroutine obstetric or neonatal care. Additionally, for select outcomes, risks were higher in the low-risk group compared to the group with identified risk factors. This information is important for planning location of birth and evaluating birthing centers and hospitals for necessary resources to ensure quality care and patient safety.
Authors: Jacoba van der Kooy; Jashvant Poeran; Johanna P de Graaf; Erwin Birnie; Semiha Denktaş; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Yvonne W Cheng; James M Nicholson; Sanae Nakagawa; Tim A Bruckner; A Eugene Washington; Aaron B Caughey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Patricia A Janssen; Lee Saxell; Lesley A Page; Michael C Klein; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee Journal: CMAJ Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Nicholas J Somerville; Timothy C Nielsen; Elizabeth Harvey; Sarah Rae Easter; Brian Bateman; Hafsatou Diop; Susan E Manning Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2019-09
Authors: Rie Sakai-Bizmark; Hiraku Kumamaru; Dennys Estevez; Sophia Neman; Lauren E M Bedel; Laurie A Mena; Emily H Marr; Michael G Ross Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 7.418
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert; Anthony Sciscione; Deborah A Wing; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; Ronald Wapner; Mary E D'Alton; Daniel Skupski; Michael P Nageotte; Angela C Ranzini; John Owen; Edward K Chien; Sabrina Craigo; Mary L Hediger; Sungduk Kim; Cuilin Zhang; Katherine L Grantz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Katy B Kozhimannil; Michelle M Casey; Peiyin Hung; Shailendra Prasad; Ira S Moscovice Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Renato T Souza; Jose Guilherme Cecatti; Jussara Mayrink; Rafael Bessa Galvão; Maria Laura Costa; Francisco Feitosa; Edilberto Rocha Filho; Debora F Leite; Janete Vettorazzi; Ricardo P Tedesco; Danielly S Santana; Joao Paulo Souza Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-20 Impact factor: 2.692