Literature DB >> 26957892

Childbirth Education Prior to Pregnancy? Survey Findings of Childbirth Preferences and Attitudes Among Young Women.

Joyce K Edmonds, Taylor Cwiertniewicz, Kathrin Stoll.   

Abstract

The childbirth preferences and attitudes of young women prior to pregnancy (N = 758) were explored in a cross-sectional survey. Sources of influential childbirth information and self-reported childbirth learning needs were described. Young women's attitudes about childbirth, including the degree of confidence in coping with a vaginal birth, whether birth is considered a natural event, and expectations of labor pain were associated with their mode of birth preference. Conversations with friends and family were the most influential source of childbirth information. Gaps in knowledge about pregnancy and birth were identified. An improved understanding of women's preferences and attitudinal profiles can inform the structure and content of educational strategies that aim to help the next generation of maternity care consumers participate in informed decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; cesarean birth; childbirth; childbirth education; preference; young women

Year:  2015        PMID: 26957892      PMCID: PMC4744342          DOI: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.2.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Educ        ISSN: 1058-1243


  29 in total

1.  Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study.

Authors:  Josephine M Green; Helen A Baston
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 2.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal complications.

Authors:  Young Mi Lee; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Why are young Canadians afraid of birth? A survey study of childbirth fear and birth preferences among Canadian University students.

Authors:  Kathrin Stoll; Wendy Hall; Patricia Janssen; Elaine Carty
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  "Midwives are nice, but . . .": perceptions of midwifery and childbirth in an undergraduate class.

Authors:  Sharon Bernecki DeJoy
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Requesting cesareans without medical indications: an option being considered by young canadian women.

Authors:  Frances Gallagher; Linda Bell; Guy Waddell; Annie Benoît; Nathalie Côté
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  ACOG Committee Opinion number 313, September 2005. The importance of preconception care in the continuum of women's health care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Steven L Clark; Michael A Belfort; Gary A Dildy; Melissa A Herbst; Janet A Meyers; Gary D Hankins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both.

Authors:  A J Gagnon; J Sandall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

10.  Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Lee Saxell; Lesley A Page; Michael C Klein; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  Teaching University Students About Evidence-Based Perinatal Care: Effects on Learning and Future Care Preferences.

Authors:  Elizabeth Soliday; Suzanne R Smith
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2017

2.  Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Adeline Adwoa Boatin; Anne Schlotheuber; Ana Pilar Betran; Ann-Beth Moller; Aluisio J D Barros; Ties Boerma; Maria Regina Torloni; Cesar G Victora; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-01-24

3.  Impacts of online and group perinatal education: a mixed methods study protocol for the optimization of perinatal health services.

Authors:  Geneviève Roch; Roxane Borgès Da Silva; Francine de Montigny; Holly O Witteman; Tamarha Pierce; Sonia Semenic; Julie Poissant; André-Anne Parent; Deena White; Nils Chaillet; Carl-Ardy Dubois; Mathieu Ouimet; Geneviève Lapointe; Stéphane Turcotte; Alexandre Prud'homme; Geneviève Painchaud Guérard; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Effects of reviewing childbirth scenarios on choice of delivery type: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Massome Rasoli; Seyed Mohammad Mirrezaie; Ensieh Fooladi; Robabeh Zarouj Hosseini; Mahsa Fayaz
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.