Literature DB >> 8434272

Experiences of Australian mothers who gave birth either at home, at a birth centre, or in hospital labour wards.

J D Cunningham1.   

Abstract

In order to compare their antenatal education levels, reasons for choosing the birthplace, experiences during labor and childbirth, analgesia, satisfaction with birth attendants and others present, and related attitudes 395 Sydney-area mothers were recruited within one year of giving birth. Five sources were used to obtain mail-questionnaire responses from 239 who gave birth in a hospital labor ward, 35 at a birth centre, and 121 who chose to give birth at home. Homebirth mothers were older, more educated, more feminist, more willing to accept responsibility for maintaining their own health, better read on childbirth, more likely to be multiparous, and gave higher rating of their midwives than labour-ward mothers, with birth-centre mothers generally scoring between the other two groups. As well, homebirth and birth-centre mothers were more likely to feel the birthplace affected the bonding process and were less likely to regard birth as a medical condition than labour-ward mothers. In regression analysis birth venue (among other variables) significantly predicted satisfaction with doctor, if present during labour and delivery, and five variables correlated with birth venue significantly predicted satisfaction with midwife, husband/partner, and other support person. Findings are discussed in the light of the current struggle between medical and 'natural' models of childbirth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434272     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90409-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  Home birth.

Authors:  N P Springer; C Van Weel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

2.  Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group.

Authors:  J Davies; E Hey; W Reid; G Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23

3.  In search of a common agenda for planned home birth in america.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

4.  The meaning of "control" for childbearing women in the US.

Authors:  Emily E Namey; Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?

Authors:  T Dowswell; J G Thornton; J Hewison; R J Lilford; J Raisler; A Macfarlane; G Young; M Newburn; R Dodds; R S Settatree
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-23

6.  Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Lee Saxell; Lesley A Page; Michael C Klein; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women.

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Anna Margrethe Møller; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Lisbeth B Knudsen; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Concurrent analysis of choice and control in childbirth.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Colin Martin; Julie Jomeen; Caroline Hollins Martin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Costs of Planned Home vs. Hospital Birth in British Columbia Attended by Registered Midwives and Physicians.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Craig Mitton; Jaafar Aghajanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study.

Authors:  Celia Grigg; Sally K Tracy; Rea Daellenbach; Mary Kensington; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.