Literature DB >> 19706578

Informing parents about expanded newborn screening: influences on provider involvement.

Robin Z Hayeems1, Fiona A Miller, Julian Little, June C Carroll, Judith Allanson, Pranesh Chakraborty, Brenda J Wilson, Jessica P Bytautas, Robert J Christensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Expanded newborn screening (NBS) identifies some disorders for which clinical benefit is uncertain, as well as "incidental" findings (eg, carrier status), thus enhancing the need to inform parents about NBS before sample collection.
METHODS: A self-complete survey was sent to a cross-sectional, stratified, random sample of 5 provider groups in Ontario (obstetricians, midwives, family physicians, pediatricians, and nurses). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the effects of core beliefs, perceived barriers, and demographic characteristics on the reported frequency of informing parents about NBS before sample collection.
RESULTS: Virtually all of the midwives and almost half of the nurses reported discussing NBS with parents, whereas less than one sixth of the physicians did so. Providers who perceived a responsibility to inform parents were 3 times more likely to report doing so than those who did not perceive this responsibility (odds ratio: 2.9 [95% confidence interval: 2.1-4.1]). Those who lacked confidence to inform parents were 70% less likely to discuss NBS with parents compared with those who did not experience this cognitive barrier (odds ratio: 0.3 [95% confidence interval: 0.2-0.4]). Controlling for these covariates, family physicians and obstetricians were more likely than pediatricians to inform parents.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide guidance for capacity building among providers who are positioned to inform parents about NBS before sample collection. Our findings call for targeted educational interventions that consider patterns of provider practice related to prenatal and NBS care, seek to redress confidence limitations, and engage key provider groups in the importance of this professional responsibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19706578     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  13 in total

1.  Health-care providers' views on pursuing reproductive benefit through newborn screening: the case of sickle cell disorders.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Brenda J Wilson; June C Carroll; Martha Paynter; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; June C Carroll; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  The expansion of newborn screening: is reproductive benefit an appropriate pursuit?

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers; Martina C Cornel; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Sarah Patton; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Education and parental involvement in decision-making about newborn screening: understanding goals to clarify content.

Authors:  Beth K Potter; Holly Etchegary; Stuart G Nicholls; Brenda J Wilson; Samantha M Craigie; Makda H Araia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Parental permission for pilot newborn screening research: guidelines from the NBSTRN.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Michael S Watson; Kathryn J Swoboda; Rebecca Anderson; Susan A Berry; Natasha Bonhomme; Jeffrey P Brosco; Anne M Comeau; Aaron Goldenberg; Edward Goldman; Bradford Therrell; Jill Levy-Fisch; Beth Tarini; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Role of primary care providers in caring for infants with positive screening results.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Expectations and values about expanded newborn screening: a public engagement study.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Yvonne Bombard; Denise Avard; June Carroll; Brenda Wilson; Julian Little; Pranesh Chakraborty; Jessica Bytautas; Yves Giguere; Judith Allanson; Renata Axler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Residual newborn screening samples for research: parental information needs for decision-making.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Lauren Clark; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 1.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.