Literature DB >> 23946032

Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Robin Z Hayeems1, Fiona A Miller, June C Carroll, Julian Little, Judith Allanson, Jessica P Bytautas, Pranesh Chakraborty, Brenda J Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of primary care providers in informing and supporting families who receive positive screening results.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians, pediatricians, and midwives involved in newborn care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Beliefs, practices, and barriers related to providing information to families who receive positive screening results for their newborns.
RESULTS: A total of 819 providers participated (adjusted response rate of 60.9%). Of the respondents, 67.4% to 81.0% agreed that it was their responsibility to provide care to families of newborns who received positive screening results, and 64.2% to 84.8% agreed they should provide brochures or engage in general discussions about the identified conditions. Of the pediatricians, 67.3% endorsed having detailed discussions with families, but only 24.1% of family physicians and 27.6% of midwives endorsed this practice. All provider groups reported less involvement in information provision than they believed they should have. This discrepancy was most evident for family physicians: most stated that they should provide brochures (64.2%) or engage in general discussions (73.5%), but only a minority did so (15.3% and 27.7%, respectively). Family physicians reported insufficient time (42.2%), compensation (52.2%), and training (72.3%) to play this role, and only a minority agreed they were up to date (18.5%) or confident (16.5%) regarding newborn screening.
CONCLUSION: Providers of primary newborn care see an information-provision role for themselves in caring for families who receive positive newborn screening results. Efforts to further define the scope of this role combined with efforts to mitigate existing barriers are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946032      PMCID: PMC3743702     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  29 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services.

Authors:  J Emery; E Watson; P Rose; A Andermann
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Primary care physician supply and children's health care use, access, and outcomes: findings from Canada.

Authors:  Astrid Guttmann; Scott A Shipman; Kelvin Lam; David C Goodman; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Newborn blood spot screening and genetic services: a survey of Minnesota primary care physicians.

Authors:  Diane B Thompson; Mary J Ahrens; Bonnie S LeRoy; Dana Brown; Susan A Berry
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

5.  Newborn screening expands: recommendations for pediatricians and medical homes--implications for the system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Louise Acheson; Jeffery Botkin; Kenneth Bridges; Ardis Davis; James Evans; Jaime Frias; James Hanson; Norman Kahn; Ruth Kahn; David Lanier; Linda E Pinsky; Nancy Press; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Eugene Rich; Nancy Stevens; Elizabeth Thomson; Steven Wartman; Modena Wilson
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2002

7.  Examination of the communication practices between state newborn screening programs and the medical home.

Authors:  Sunnah Kim; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Thomas F Tonniges
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The gap between practice and genetics education of health professionals: HuGEM survey results.

Authors:  E V Lapham; C Kozma; J O Weiss; J L Benkendorf; M A Wilson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Needs assessment study of genetics education for general practitioners in Australia.

Authors:  Sylvia Metcalfe; Rosalind Hurworth; Jennifer Newstead; Rosemary Robins
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Sarah Patton; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Sickle cell trait newborn screen results: disclosure and management.

Authors:  Margaret Lilley; Stephanie Hoang; Pamela Blumenschein; Ann-Marie Peturson; Iveta Sosova; Lauren Macneil; Ross Ridsdale; Susan Christian
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Introduction to Biochemical Genetics from the Clinical Laboratory Prospective: A Case-Based Discussion.

Authors:  Irene De Biase; Margarita Diaz-Ochu; Mary Rindler; Wendy L Hobson-Rohrer
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2017-05-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.