Literature DB >> 24394680

Parental permission for pilot newborn screening research: guidelines from the NBSTRN.

Jeffrey R Botkin1, Michelle Huckaby Lewis, Michael S Watson, Kathryn J Swoboda, Rebecca Anderson, Susan A Berry, Natasha Bonhomme, Jeffrey P Brosco, Anne M Comeau, Aaron Goldenberg, Edward Goldman, Bradford Therrell, Jill Levy-Fisch, Beth Tarini, Benjamin Wilfond.   

Abstract

There is broad recognition of the need for population-based research to assess the safety and efficacy of newborn screening (NBS) for conditions that are not on current panels. However, prospective population-based research poses significant ethical, regulatory, and logistical challenges. In the context of NBS, there have been a variety of approaches that address parental decision-making in pilot studies of new screening tests or conditions. This article presents an ethical and legal analysis of the role of parental permission by the Bioethics and Legal Work Group of the Newborn Screening Translational Research Network created under a contract from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Circumstances are outlined in which a waiver of documentation of permission or a waiver of permission may be ethically and legally appropriate in the NBS context. These guidelines do not constitute American Academy of Pediatrics policy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  informed consent; newborn screening; parental permission; research; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24394680      PMCID: PMC3904278          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-2271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  19 in total

1.  Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: a blueprint for the future - a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Parents: critical stakeholders in expanding newborn screening.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Darrel J Waggoner
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Research for newborn screening: developing a national framework.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  State newborn screening in the tandem mass spectrometry era: more tests, more false-positive results.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; Dimitri A Christakis; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Pilot programs in newborn screening.

Authors:  Kenneth Pass; Nancy S Green; Fred Lorey; John Sherwin; Anne Marie Comeau
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2006

6.  Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system--executive summary.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Questioning the Need for Informed Consent: A Case Study of California's Experience with a Pilot Newborn Screening Research Project.

Authors:  Lisa Feuchtbaum; George Cunningham; Stan Sciortino
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Psychosocial risk associated with newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: parents' experience while awaiting the sweat-test appointment.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Rebecca L Koscik; Philip M Farrell; Michael J Rock
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Expanded newborn screening for biochemical disorders: the effect of a false-positive result.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gurian; Daniel D Kinnamon; Judith J Henry; Susan E Waisbren
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  An evidence development process for newborn screening.

Authors:  James M Perrin; Alixandra A Knapp; Marsha F Browning; Anne Marie Comeau; Nancy S Green; Ellen A Lipstein; Danielle R Metterville; Lisa Prosser; Denise Queally; Alex R Kemper
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  12 in total

1.  Challenges of using next generation sequencing in newborn screening.

Authors:  Eyal Reinstein
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 2.  Newborn bloodspot screening policy framework for Australia.

Authors:  Peter O'Leary; Susannah Maxwell
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2015-09-30

3.  Consent for newborn screening: parents' and health-care professionals' experiences of consent in practice.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Stuart G Nicholls; Laure Tessier; Charlene Simmonds; Beth K Potter; Jamie C Brehaut; Daryl Pullman; Robyn Hayeems; Sari Zelenietz; Monica Lamoureux; Jennifer Milburn; Lesley Turner; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Successful newborn screening for SCID in the Navajo Nation.

Authors:  Antonia Kwan; Diana Hu; Miran Song; Heidi Gomes; Denise R Brown; Trudy Bourque; Diana Gonzalez-Espinosa; Zhili Lin; Morton J Cowan; Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  A framework for assessing outcomes from newborn screening: on the road to measuring its promise.

Authors:  Cynthia F Hinton; Charles J Homer; Alexis A Thompson; Andrea Williams; Kathryn L Hassell; Lisa Feuchtbaum; Susan A Berry; Anne Marie Comeau; Bradford L Therrell; Amy Brower; Katharine B Harris; Christine Brown; Jana Monaco; Robert J Ostrander; Alan E Zuckerman; Celia Kaye; Denise Dougherty; Carol Greene; Nancy S Green
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.797

6.  Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory.

Authors:  Nicole Kelly; Dalia Chehayeb Makarem; Melissa P Wasserstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Framing optional genetic testing in the context of mandatory newborn screening tests.

Authors:  Sarah E Lillie; Beth A Tarini; Nancy K Janz; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Ethical Challenges in Infant Feeding Research.

Authors:  Colin Binns; Mi Kyung Lee; Masaharu Kagawa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Policy Making in Newborn Screening Needs a Structured and Transparent Approach.

Authors:  Marleen E Jansen; Karla J Lister; Henk J van Kranen; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-03-21

10.  Understanding the experiences and needs of individuals with Spinal Muscular Atrophy and their parents: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ying Qian; Sarah McGraw; Jeff Henne; Jill Jarecki; Kenneth Hobby; Wei-Shi Yeh
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.