Literature DB >> 19763150

The expansion of newborn screening: is reproductive benefit an appropriate pursuit?

Yvonne Bombard1, Fiona A Miller, Robin Z Hayeems, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19763150     DOI： 10.1038/nrg2666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN： 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Changing perspectives on the benefits of newborn screening.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Laura M Beskow; Arlene M Davis; Debra Skinner
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2006

2.  A vision of the future of newborn screening.

Authors:  Duane Alexander; Peter C van Dyck
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Questioning the consensus: managing carrier status results generated by newborn screening.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Jason Scott Robert; Robin Z Hayeems
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Expanding newborn screening: process, policy, and priorities.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer; Ned Calonge; Steven M Teutsch; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Informing parents about expanded newborn screening: influences on provider involvement.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Julian Little; June C Carroll; Judith Allanson; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda J Wilson; Jessica P Bytautas; Robert J Christensen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  A survey to evaluate parental consent as public policy for neonatal screening.

Authors:  R Faden; A J Chwalow; N A Holtzman; S D Horn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Parental rights, child welfare, and public health: the case of PKU screening.

Authors:  R R Faden; N A Holtzman; A J Chwalow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Newborn screening for developmental disabilities: reframing presumptive benefit.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Debra Skinner; Steven F Warren
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Carrier testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.822
View more
  10 in total

1.  Health-care providers' views on pursuing reproductive benefit through newborn screening: the case of sickle cell disorders.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Brenda J Wilson; June C Carroll; Martha Paynter; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Reply to Ross' commentary: Reproductive benefit through newborn screening: preferences, policy and ethics.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  A question of benefit.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: the case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Sarah J Patton; June C Carroll; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; Robin Z Hayeems
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Genomic newborn screening: public health policy considerations and recommendations.

Authors:  Jan M Friedman; Martina C Cornel; Aaron J Goldenberg; Karla J Lister; Karine Sénécal; Danya F Vears
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Newborn genetic screening for spinal muscular atrophy in the UK: The views of the general population.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Chloe Sadler; Philip J Young
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 10.  Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnostics.

Authors:  Tessel Rigter; Lidewij Henneman; Ulf Kristoffersson; Alison Hall; Helger G Yntema; Pascal Borry; Holger Tönnies; Quinten Waisfisz; Mariet W Elting; Wybo J Dondorp; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.878
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.