Literature DB >> 29948517

Genomic prediction using an iterative conditional expectation algorithm for a fast BayesC-like model.

Linsong Dong1, Zhiyong Wang2,3.   

Abstract

Genomic prediction is feasible for estimating genomic breeding values because of dense genome-wide markers and credible statistical methods, such as Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) and various Bayesian methods. Compared with GBLUP, Bayesian methods propose more flexible assumptions for the distributions of SNP effects. However, most Bayesian methods are performed based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, leading to computational efficiency challenges. Hence, some fast Bayesian approaches, such as fast BayesB (fBayesB), were proposed to speed up the calculation. This study proposed another fast Bayesian method termed fast BayesC (fBayesC). The prior distribution of fBayesC assumes that a SNP with probability γ has a non-zero effect which comes from a normal density with a common variance. The simulated data from QTLMAS XII workshop and actual data on large yellow croaker were used to compare the predictive results of fBayesB, fBayesC and (MCMC-based) BayesC. The results showed that when γ was set as a small value, such as 0.01 in the simulated data or 0.001 in the actual data, fBayesB and fBayesC yielded lower prediction accuracies (abilities) than BayesC. In the actual data, fBayesC could yield very similar predictive abilities as BayesC when γ ≥ 0.01. When γ = 0.01, fBayesB could also yield similar results as fBayesC and BayesC. However, fBayesB could not yield an explicit result when γ ≥ 0.1, but a similar situation was not observed for fBayesC. Moreover, the computational speed of fBayesC was significantly faster than that of BayesC, making fBayesC a promising method for genomic prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational speed; Fast BayesC; Genomic prediction; Predictive ability; Prior distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948517     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-018-0027-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  32 in total

1.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.

Authors:  Tu Luan; John A Woolliams; Sigbjørn Lien; Matthew Kent; Morten Svendsen; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  HTQC: a fast quality control toolkit for Illumina sequencing data.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Di Liu; Fei Liu; Jun Wu; Jing Zou; Xue Xiao; Fangqing Zhao; Baoli Zhu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Genomic selection and complex trait prediction using a fast EM algorithm applied to genome-wide markers.

Authors:  Ross K Shepherd; Theo H E Meuwissen; John A Woolliams
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Genome sequencing of the perciform fish Larimichthys crocea provides insights into molecular and genetic mechanisms of stress adaptation.

Authors:  Jingqun Ao; Yinnan Mu; Li-Xin Xiang; DingDing Fan; MingJi Feng; Shicui Zhang; Qiong Shi; Lv-Yun Zhu; Ting Li; Yang Ding; Li Nie; Qiuhua Li; Wei-Ren Dong; Liang Jiang; Bing Sun; XinHui Zhang; Mingyu Li; Hai-Qi Zhang; ShangBo Xie; YaBing Zhu; XuanTing Jiang; Xianhui Wang; Pengfei Mu; Wei Chen; Zhen Yue; Zhuo Wang; Jun Wang; Jian-Zhong Shao; Xinhua Chen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  A fast and efficient Gibbs sampler for BayesB in whole-genome analyses.

Authors:  Hao Cheng; Long Qu; Dorian J Garrick; Rohan L Fernando
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Bioinformatic analysis of genotype by sequencing (GBS) data with NGSEP.

Authors:  Claudia Perea; Juan Fernando De La Hoz; Daniel Felipe Cruz; Juan David Lobaton; Paulo Izquierdo; Juan Camilo Quintero; Bodo Raatz; Jorge Duitama
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping.

Authors:  Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.