Literature DB >> 28029150

Incorporating the single-step strategy into a random regression model to enhance genomic prediction of longitudinal traits.

H Kang1, L Zhou1, R Mrode2, Q Zhang1, J-F Liu1.   

Abstract

In prediction of genomic values, the single-step method has been demonstrated to outperform multi-step methods. In statistical analyses of longitudinal traits, the random regression test-day model (RR-TDM) has clear advantages over other models. Our goal in this study was to evaluate the performance of a model that integrates both single-step and RR-TDM prediction methods, called the single-step random regression test-day model (SS RR-TDM), in comparison with the pedigree-based RR-TDM and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. We performed extensive simulations to exploit the potential advantages of SS RR-TDM over the other two models under various scenarios with different levels of heritability, number of quantitative trait loci, as well as selection scheme. SS RR-TDM was found to achieve the highest accuracy and unbiasedness under all scenarios, exhibiting robust prediction ability in longitudinal trait analyses. Moreover, SS RR-TDM showed better persistency of accuracy over generations than the GBLUP model. In addition, we also found that the SS RR-TDM had advantages over RR-TDM and GBLUP in terms of its being a real data set of humans contributed by the Genetic Analysis Workshop 18. The findings of our study demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of SS RR-TDM, thus enhancing the strategies for genomic prediction of longitudinal traits in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28029150      PMCID: PMC5677992          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  33 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock.

Authors:  Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  A Legarra; I Aguilar; I Misztal
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale.

Authors:  C Y Chen; I Misztal; I Aguilar; A Legarra; W M Muir
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.

Authors:  Tu Luan; John A Woolliams; Sigbjørn Lien; Matthew Kent; Morten Svendsen; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; John M Hickey; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  6 in total

1.  Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Raphael Mrode; Shengli Zhang; Qin Zhang; Bugao Li; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Integrating High-Throughput Phenotyping and Statistical Genomic Methods to Genetically Improve Longitudinal Traits in Crops.

Authors:  Fabiana F Moreira; Hinayah R Oliveira; Jeffrey J Volenec; Katy M Rainey; Luiz F Brito
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  PIBLUP: High-Performance Software for Large-Scale Genetic Evaluation of Animals and Plants.

Authors:  Huimin Kang; Chao Ning; Lei Zhou; Shengli Zhang; Ning Yang; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  A Random Regression Model Based on a Single-Step Method for Improving the Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Residual Feed Intake in Pigs.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Chenguang Diao; Huimin Kang; Wenjie Hao; Raphael Mrode; Junhai Chen; Jianfeng Liu; Lei Zhou
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Genetic analysis of egg production traits in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) using a single-step genomic random regression model.

Authors:  Hakimeh Emamgholi Begli; Lawrence R Schaeffer; Emhimad Abdalla; Emmanuel A Lozada-Soto; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.

Authors:  N Khalilisamani; P C Thomson; H W Raadsma; M S Khatkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.