Literature DB >> 25008966

Behavioral frequency discrimination ability of partially deafened cats using cochlear implants.

Yuri B Benovitski1, Peter J Blamey2, Graeme D Rathbone1, James B Fallon3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of cochlear implant (CI) use on behavioral frequency discrimination ability in partially deafened cats. We hypothesized that the additional information provided by the CI would allow subjects to perform better on a frequency discrimination task. Four cats with a high frequency hearing loss induced by ototoxic drugs were first trained on a go/no-go, positive reinforcement, frequency discrimination task and reached asymptotic performance (measured by d' - detection theory). Reference frequencies (1, 4, and 7 kHz) were systematically rotated (Block design) every 9-11 days to cover the hearing range of the cats while avoiding bias arising from the order of testing. Animals were then implanted with an intracochlear electrode array connected to a CI and speech processor. They then underwent 6 months of continuous performance measurement with the CI turned on, except for one month when the stimulator was turned off. Overall, subjects performed the frequency discrimination task significantly better with their CI turned on than in the CI-off condition (3-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). The analysis showed no dependence on subject (3-way ANOVA, subject × on-off condition, p > 0.5); however, the CI only significantly improved performance for two (1 and 7 kHz) of the three reference frequencies. In this study we were able to show, for the first time, that cats can utilize information provided by a CI in performing a behavioral frequency discrimination task.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25008966      PMCID: PMC4140999          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  34 in total

1.  Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.

Authors:  H J McDermott; M Lech; M S Kornblum; D R Irvine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulation.

Authors:  R Klinke; A Kral; S Heid; J Tillein; R Hartmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.

Authors:  Jafar Hamzavi; Stefan Marcel Pok; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Reorganization of auditory cortex after neonatal high frequency cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  R V Harrison; A Nagasawa; D W Smith; S Stanton; R J Mount
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants.

Authors:  P Blamey; P Arndt; F Bergeron; G Bredberg; J Brimacombe; G Facer; J Larky; B Lindström; J Nedzelski; A Peterson; D Shipp; S Staller; L Whitford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid.

Authors:  M Armstrong; P Pegg; C James; P Blamey
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

7.  Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness.

Authors:  D Robertson; D R Irvine
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  An advanced multiple channel cochlear implant.

Authors:  H McDermott
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Aaron J Parkinson; Blake S Wilson; Shelley Witt; John P Preece; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations.

Authors:  P J Blamey; G J Dooley; E S Parisi; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Julia King; Ina Shehu; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.