Literature DB >> 24921595

A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation.

S Irving1, A K Wise, R E Millard, R K Shepherd, J B Fallon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CIs) have provided some auditory function to hundreds of thousands of people around the world. Although traditionally carried out only in profoundly deaf patients, the eligibility criteria for implantation have recently been relaxed to include many partially-deaf patients with useful levels of hearing. These patients receive both electrical stimulation from their implant and acoustic stimulation via their residual hearing (electro-acoustic stimulation; EAS) and perform very well. It is unclear how EAS improves speech perception over electrical stimulation alone, and little evidence exists about the nature of the interactions between electric and acoustic stimuli. Furthermore, clinical results suggest that some patients that undergo cochlear implantation lose some, if not all, of their residual hearing, reducing the advantages of EAS over electrical stimulation alone. A reliable animal model with clinically-relevant partial deafness combined with clinical CIs is important to enable these issues to be studied. This paper outlines such a model that has been successfully used in our laboratory. APPROACH: This paper outlines a battery of techniques used in our laboratory to generate, validate and examine an animal model of partial deafness and chronic CI use. MAIN
RESULTS: Ototoxic deafening produced bilaterally symmetrical hearing thresholds in neonatal and adult animals. Electrical activation of the auditory system was confirmed, and all animals were chronically stimulated via adapted clinical CIs. Acoustic compound action potentials (CAPs) were obtained from partially-hearing cochleae, using the CI amplifier. Immunohistochemical analysis allows the effects of deafness and electrical stimulation on cell survival to be studied. SIGNIFICANCE: This animal model has applications in EAS research, including investigating the functional interactions between electric and acoustic stimulation, and the development of techniques to maintain residual hearing following cochlear implantation. The ability to record CAPs via the CI has clinical direct relevance for obtaining objective measures of residual hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24921595      PMCID: PMC4116305          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  60 in total

1.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek; R L Snyder
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Moderate noise trauma in juvenile cats results in profound cortical topographic map changes in adulthood.

Authors:  J J Eggermont; H Komiya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Localization of dynorphin B-like and alpha-neoendorphin-like immunoreactivities in the guinea pig organ of Corti.

Authors:  R A Altschuler; D W Hoffman; K A Reeks; J Fex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem.

Authors:  N A Hardie; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Huib Versnel; Vera F Prijs; Sjaak F L Klis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant.

Authors:  André L L Sampaio; Mercêdes F S Araújo; Carlos A C P Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-13

10.  Defining the cellular environment in the organ of Corti following extensive hair cell loss: a basis for future sensory cell replacement in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Ruth R Taylor; Daniel J Jagger; Andrew Forge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Andrew K Wise; Ya Lang Enke; Paul M Carter; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Second spatial derivative analysis of cortical surface potentials recorded in cat primary auditory cortex using thin film surface arrays: Comparisons with multi-unit data.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Sam Irving; Satinderpall S Pannu; Angela C Tooker; Andrew K Wise; Robert K Shepherd; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Behavioral frequency discrimination ability of partially deafened cats using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yuri B Benovitski; Peter J Blamey; Graeme D Rathbone; James B Fallon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.

Authors:  S Irving; L Gillespie; R Richardson; D Rowe; J B Fallon; A K Wise
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Differential Effects of Low- and High-Dose Dexamethasone on Electrically Induced Damage of the Cultured Organ of Corti.

Authors:  Marvin N Peter; Gerrit Paasche; Uta Reich; Thomas Lenarz; Athanasia Warnecke
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.911

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.