Literature DB >> 15724084

Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.

Jan Kiefer1, Marcel Pok, Oliver Adunka, Ekkehard Stürzebecher, Wolfgang Baumgartner, Marcus Schmidt, Jochen Tillein, Qing Ye, Wolfgang Gstoettner.   

Abstract

Combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system is a new therapy for patients with severe to profound high- and mid-frequency hearing loss but remaining low-frequency hearing. In a prospective study, 13 patients with low-frequency hearing of better than 60 dB below 1 kHz were implanted with a MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Pure tone thresholds as well as monosyllabic word scores and Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentences in quiet and in noise were measured with hearing aids, cochlear implant alone and in the combined stimulation mode (EAS) in the same ear. Hearing could be partially preserved in 11 out of the 13 patients. All patients scored significantly higher with cochlear implant alone than with hearing aids. Seven patients scored higher in the EAS mode than with cochlear implant alone for sentences in noise, 4 remained unchanged, and 2 could not use EAS. Synergistic effects of EAS were most prominent for hearing in noise with increases of up to 72% as compared to cochlear implant alone. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15724084     DOI: 10.1159/000084023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  78 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  In vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic study of a dexamethasone-releasing silicone for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ya Liu; Claude Jolly; Susanne Braun; Thomas Stark; Elias Scherer; Stefan K Plontke; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 5.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

6.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?

Authors:  Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; James B Fallon; Jin Xu; Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

Review 8.  Drug delivery for treatment of inner ear disease: current state of knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew A McCall; Erin E Leary Swan; Jeffrey T Borenstein; William F Sewell; Sharon G Kujawa; Michael J McKenna
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Ganglion cell and 'dendrite' populations in electric acoustic stimulation ears.

Authors:  Helge Rask-Andersen; Wei Liu; Fred Linthicum
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.