Literature DB >> 10217884

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo.

C Q Huang1, R K Shepherd, P M Carter, P M Seligman, B Tabor.   

Abstract

Neural prostheses use charge recovery mechanisms to ensure the electrical stimulus is charge balanced. Nucleus cochlear implants short all stimulating electrodes between pulses in order to achieve charge balance, resulting in a small residual direct current (DC). In the present study we sought to characterize the variation of this residual DC with different charge recovery mechanisms, stimulation modes, and stimulation parameters, and by modeling, to gain insight into the underlying mechanisms. In an acute study with anaesthetised guinea pigs, DC was measured in four platinum intracochlear electrodes stimulated using a Nucleus C124M cochlear implant at moderate to high pulse rates (1200-14,500 pulses/s) and stimulus intensities (0.2-1.75 mA at 26-200 microseconds/phase). Both monopolar and bipolar stimulation modes were used, and the effects of shorting or combining a capacitor with shorting for charge recovery were investigated. Residual DC increased as a function of stimulus rate, stimulus intensity, and pulse width. DC was lower for monopolar than bipolar stimulation, and lower still with capacitively coupled monopolar stimulation. Our model suggests that residual DC is a consequence of Faradaic reactions which allow charge to leak through the electrode tissue interface. Such reactions and charge leakage are still present when capacitors are used to achieve charge recovery, but anodic and cathodic reactions are balanced in such a way that the net charge leakage is zero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10217884     DOI: 10.1109/10.752943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  26 in total

1.  Safety of multi-channel stimulation implants: a single blocking capacitor per channel is not sufficient after single-fault failure.

Authors:  Antoine Nonclercq; Laurent Lonys; Anne Vanhoestenberghe; Andreas Demosthenous; Nick Donaldson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?

Authors:  Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; James B Fallon; Jin Xu; Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A fully implantable stimulator for use in small laboratory animals.

Authors:  Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Scanning electrochemical microscopy as a novel proximity sensor for atraumatic cochlear implant insertion.

Authors:  H Watanabe; J Velmurugan; M V Mirkin; M A Svirsky; A K Lalwani; R R Llinas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Electrical stimulation causes rapid changes in electrode impedance of cell-covered electrodes.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Rachael Richardson; Rodney Millard; Peter Seligman; Robert Cowan; Robert Shepherd
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A CMOS Current Steering Neurostimulation Array With Integrated DAC Calibration and Charge Balancing.

Authors:  Elliot Greenwald; Christoph Maier; Qihong Wang; Robert Beaulieu; Ralph Etienne-Cummings; Gert Cauwenberghs; Nitish Thakor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.833

9.  A fully implantable rodent neural stimulator.

Authors:  D W J Perry; D B Grayden; R K Shepherd; J B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.