Literature DB >> 15194656

Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux.

D Sifrim1, D Castell, J Dent, P J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

To date, most concepts on the frequency of gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes and the efficiency of the antireflux barrier have been based on inferences derived from measurement of oesophageal pH. The development of intraluminal impedance monitoring has highlighted the fact that pH monitoring does not detect all gastro-oesophageal reflux events when little or no acid is present in the refluxate, even if special pH tracing analysis criteria are used. In November 2002, a workshop took place at which 11 specialists in the field of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease discussed and criticised all currently available techniques for measurement of reflux. Here, a summary of their conclusions and recommendations of how to achieve the best results from the various techniques now available for reflux measurement is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15194656      PMCID: PMC1774114          DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.033290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  40 in total

Review 1.  Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations.

Authors:  C Emde; A Garner; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  B L Weusten; L M Akkermans; G P vanBerge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-03

3.  Changes in oesophageal pH associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Are traditional criteria sensitive for detection of reflux?

Authors:  J B Wyman; J Dent; R H Holloway
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique.

Authors:  P Bechi; F Pucciani; F Baldini; F Cosi; R Falciai; R Mazzanti; A Castagnoli; A Passeri; S Boscherini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data in unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  R Breumelhof; J H Nadorp; L M Akkermans; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Which pH threshold is best in esophageal pH monitoring?

Authors:  N E Schindlbeck; H Ippisch; A G Klauser; S A Müller-Lissner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Mechanisms of lower oesophageal sphincter incompetence in patients with symptomatic gastrooesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J Dent; R H Holloway; J Toouli; W J Dodds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system.

Authors:  M F Vaezi; R G Lacamera; J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-12

9.  Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  G Champion; J E Richter; M F Vaezi; S Singh; R Alexander
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Non-invasive detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux using an ambulatory system.

Authors:  N Washington; H A Moss; C Washington; J L Greaves; R J Steele; C G Wilson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  195 in total

1.  Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Monitoring for Patients With Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Is It Ready to Use?

Authors:  Justin C Y Wu
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.924

2.  Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Rishi D Naik; Matthew H Meyers; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-04

Review 3.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease--from reflux episodes to mucosal inflammation.

Authors:  Arne Kandulski; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Functional heartburn: definition and management strategies.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Mireille Simon; Jean Paul Galmiche
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-06

5.  Clarifying the parameters of nonacid reflux.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-11

Review 6.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: A review of surgical decision making.

Authors:  Maureen Moore; Cheguevara Afaneh; Daniel Benhuri; Caroline Antonacci; Jonathan Abelson; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01-27

7.  Children with cystic fibrosis have prolonged chemical clearance of acid reflux compared to symptomatic children without cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Frederick W Woodley; Rodrigo S Machado; Don Hayes; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Ajay Kaul; Beth Skaggs; Karen McCoy; Alpa Patel; Hayat Mousa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Effect of proton pump inhibition on acid, weakly acid and weakly alkaline gastro-esophageal reflux in children.

Authors:  Helena Turk; Bruno Hauser; Jernej Brecelj; Yvan Vandenplas; Rok Orel
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.764

9.  Transcutaneous cervical esophagus ultrasound in adults: relation with ambulatory 24-h pH-monitoring and esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Sabite Kacar; Selma Uysal; Sedef Kuran; Ulku Dagli; Yasemin Ozin; Erdem Karabulut; Nurgul Sasmaz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Weakly acidic reflux in patients with chronic unexplained cough during 24 hour pressure, pH, and impedance monitoring.

Authors:  D Sifrim; L Dupont; K Blondeau; X Zhang; J Tack; J Janssens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.