Literature DB >> 21103442

High-resolution manometry: is it better for detecting esophageal disease?

John E Pandolfino1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21103442      PMCID: PMC2978413     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)        ISSN: 1554-7914


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Evaluation of esophageal motor disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; William J Bulsiewicz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-06

Review 3.  New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: impedance and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Value of spatiotemporal representation of manometric data.

Authors:  Claudia Grübel; Richard Hiscock; Geoff Hebbard
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  High-resolution manometry: a new gold standard to diagnose esophageal dysmotility?

Authors:  S Roman; J Pandolfino; F Mion
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2009-12

6.  Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  William J Bulsiewicz; Peter J Kahrilas; Monika A Kwiatek; Sudip K Ghosh; Albert Meek; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; M R Fox; A J Bredenoord; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.598

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of unidirectional and circumferential manometric measures within the pharyngoesophageal segment: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Esther Guiu Hernandez; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Richard Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The role of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of upper gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wouter Schutyser; Ludovic Cruyt; Jean-Baptiste Vulsteke; Jan L Lenaerts; Ellen De Langhe
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  A multisensor approach to improve manometric analysis of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Michelle R Ciucci; Michael J Hammer; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM): the Old-New Frontier in Esophagology.

Authors:  Ala' A Abdel Jalil; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-01

5.  Clinical features of idiopathic inflammatory polymyopathy in the Hungarian Vizsla.

Authors:  Anna Tauro; Diane Addicott; Rob D Foale; Chloe Bowman; Caroline Hahn; Sam Long; Jonathan Massey; Allison C Haley; Susan P Knowler; Michael J Day; Lorna J Kennedy; Clare Rusbridge
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Esophageal Body Motility for Clinical Assessment in Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms.

Authors:  Liuqin Jiang; Bixing Ye; Ying Wang; Meifeng Wang; Lin Lin
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.