Literature DB >> 15017607

Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.

Radu Tutuian1, Donald O Castell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) and manometry (MII-EM) recently became available as an esophageal function test. Initial studies in healthy volunteers have shown that a proportion of ineffective contractions actually have complete bolus transit. The aim of our study is to evaluate esophageal bolus transit in patients with manometric patterns of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).
METHODS: All patients referred for esophageal function testing during a 9-month period underwent combined MII-EM studies, including 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. IEM is defined as >or=30% liquid swallows with contraction amplitude <30 mm Hg in the distal esophagus. Diagnosis of esophageal transit abnormalities is defined as abnormal bolus transit if >or=30% of liquid and >or=40% of viscous swallows had incomplete bolus transit.
RESULTS: Seventy patients (35 women; mean age, 54 yr; range, 17-86 yr) with a manometric diagnosis of IEM were identified of a total of 350 combined MII-EM studies. In these patients, 68% of liquid and 59% of viscous swallows showed normal bolus transit, and almost one third of patients received an overall diagnosis of normal bolus transit for both liquid and viscous swallows.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with combined MII-EM in patients with a manometric diagnosis of IEM confirms the suspicion that "effectiveness" should only be determined by using a test of esophageal function. Furthermore, we believe our results support a conclusion that a higher level of esophageal diagnostic information is best obtained by combined MII-EM. Future outcome studies should establish its value in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia and in prefundoplication assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017607     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00010-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  41 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  Gastroesophageal reflux and altered motility in lung transplant rejection.

Authors:  J M Castor; R K Wood; A J Muir; S M Palmer; R A Shimpi
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Technological insights: combined impedance manometry for esophageal motility testing-current results and further implications.

Authors:  Huan Nam Nguyen; Gerson Ricardo Souza Domingues; Frank Lammert
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: impedance and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  High-resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography: filling the gaps of convention manometry.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  High-resolution impedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motility evaluation in non-obstructive dysphagia patients without a major Chicago Classification motility disorder.

Authors:  D A Carlson; T Omari; Z Lin; N Rommel; K Starkey; P J Kahrilas; J Tack; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Criteria for assessing esophageal motility in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band patients: the importance of the lower esophageal contractile segment.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Can different subsets of ineffective esophageal motility influence the outcome of nissen fundoplication?

Authors:  Aleksandar P Simić; Ognjan M Skrobić; Richard R Gurski; Vladimir M Šljukić; Nenad R Ivanović; Predrag M Peško
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  William J Bulsiewicz; Peter J Kahrilas; Monika A Kwiatek; Sudip K Ghosh; Albert Meek; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: medical or surgical treatment?

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; George Karamanolis; Paul Patapis; Evangelos P Misiakos
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.