Literature DB >> 9331148

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder.

L P Leite1, B T Johnston, J Barrett, J A Castell, D O Castell.   

Abstract

Nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NEMD) is a vague category used to include patients with poorly defined esophageal contraction abnormalities. The criteria include "ineffective" contraction waves, ie, peristaltic waves that are either of low amplitude or are not transmitted. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) found during manometry testing and to evaluate esophageal acid exposure and esophageal acid clearance (EAC) in patients with IEM compared to those with other motility findings. We analyzed esophageal manometric tracings from 600 consecutive patients undergoing manometry in our laboratory following a specific protocol from April 1992 through October 1994 to identify the frequency of ineffective contractions and the percentages of other motility abnormalities present in patients meeting criteria for NEMD. Comparison of acid exposure and EAC was made with 150 patients who also had both esophageal manometry and pH-metry over the same time period. Sixty-one of 600 patients (10%) met the diagnostic criteria for NEMD. Sixty of 61 (98%) of these patients had IEM, defined by at least 30% ineffective contractions out of 10 wet swallows. Thirty-five of these patients also underwent ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Patients with IEM demonstrated significant increases in both recumbent median percentage of time of pH <4 (4.5%) and median distal EAC (4.2 min/episode) compared to those with normal motility (0.2%, 1 min/episode), diffuse esophageal spasm (0%, 0.6 min/episode), hypertensive LES (0%, 1.8 min/episode), and nutcracker esophagus (0.4% 1.6 min/episode). Recumbent acid exposure in IEM did not differ significantly from that in patients with systemic scleroderma (SSc) for either variable (5.4%, 4.2 min/episode). We propose that IEM is a more appropriate term and should replace NEMD, giving it a more specific manometric identity. IEM patients demonstrate a distinctive recumbent reflux pattern, similar to that seen in patients with SSc. This finding indicates that there is an association between IEM and recumbent GER. Whether IEM is the cause or the effect of increased esophageal acid exposure remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9331148     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018802908358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  26 in total

Review 1.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; R E Clouse; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Peristaltic dysfunction associated with nonobstructive dysphagia in reflux disease.

Authors:  P Jacob; P J Kahrilas; A Vanagunas
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Reflux oesophagitis and oesophageal transit: evidence for a primary oesophageal motor disorder.

Authors:  C A Eriksen; S A Sadek; C Cranford; D Sutton; N Kennedy; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Audit of the role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  P W Johnston; B T Johnston; B J Collins; J S Collins; A H Love
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Does surgery correct esophageal motor dysfunction in gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  C O Russell; C E Pope; R M Gannan; F D Allen; N Velasco; L D Hill
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter pressures and gastroesophageal reflux: an apparent paradox that is not unusual.

Authors:  D A Katzka; M Sidhu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Oesophageal motility and gastro-oesophageal reflux before and after healing of reflux oesophagitis. A study using 24 hour ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring.

Authors:  R Timmer; R Breumelhof; J H Nadorp; A J Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Chest pain associated with nutcracker esophagus: a preliminary study of the role of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  S R Achem; B E Kolts; R Wears; L Burton; J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Abnormal esophageal pressures in reflux esophagitis: cause or effect?

Authors:  P O Katz; T E Knuff; S B Benjamin; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Esophageal function in systemic sclerosis: a prospective evaluation of motility and acid reflux in 36 patients.

Authors:  J C Yarze; J Varga; D Stampfl; D O Castell; S A Jimenez
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  58 in total

1.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Comparison of esophageal motility in patients with solid dysphagia and mixed dysphagia.

Authors:  Chien-Lin Chen; William C Orr
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  Oesophageal motor functions and its disorders.

Authors:  R K Mittal; V Bhalla
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Clinical and manometric course of nonspecific esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Michaela Müller; Alexander J Eckardt; Björn Göpel; Volker F Eckardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Is there an association between hiatal hernia and ineffective esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Authors:  Leonardo Menegaz Conrado; Richard Ricachenevsky Gurski; André Ricardo Pereira da Rosa; Aleksandar Petar Simic; Sídia Maria Callegari-Jacques
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Gastroesophageal reflux and altered motility in lung transplant rejection.

Authors:  J M Castor; R K Wood; A J Muir; S M Palmer; R A Shimpi
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Obese patients have stronger peristalsis and increased acid exposure in the esophagus.

Authors:  Fernando Fornari; Sidia M Callegari-Jacques; Roberto Oliveira Dantas; Ana Lúcia Scarsi; Liana Ortiz Ruas; Sérgio Gabriel Silva de Barros
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The effect of an effortful swallow on the normal adult esophagus.

Authors:  Teresa E Lever; Kathleen T Cox; Donald Holbert; Mamun Shahrier; Monica Hough; Kristine Kelley-Salamon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Patients with ineffective esophageal motility benefit from laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Alex Addo; Philip George; H Reza Zahiri; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Surgical treatment for nonspecific esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Takanori Inose; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Shigemasa Suzuki; Naritaka Tanaka; Makoto Sakai; Akihiko Sano; Takehiko Yokobori; Makoto Sohda; Masanobu Nakajima; Minoru Fukuchi; Hiroyuki Kato; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.