Literature DB >> 22019480

Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry.

Megan H Papesh1, Stephen D Goldinger, Michael C Hout.   

Abstract

Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019480      PMCID: PMC3251658          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  62 in total

1.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging.

Authors:  Pascal W M Van Gerven; Fred Paas; Jeroen J G Van Merriënboer; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Laura Mickes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon.

Authors:  A Lahiri; W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-03

5.  Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory.

Authors:  S M Sheffert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-10

6.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  K B Clark; D K Naritoku; D C Smith; R A Browning; R A Jensen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more
  31 in total

1.  Pupil dilation signals recognition salience.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-15

2.  Memory processes underlying long-term semantic priming.

Authors:  Christopher Was; Dan Woltz; Dale Hirsch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

3.  Pupil dilation as an indicator of future thinking.

Authors:  Mohamad El Haj; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Ashley L Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01

5.  Pupil Dilation Reflects the Creation and Retrieval of Memories.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03-20

6.  Pupil-BLAH-metry: cognitive effort in speech planning reflected by pupil dilation.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia.

Authors:  Laura R Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Ocular measures during associative learning predict recall accuracy.

Authors:  Aakash A Dave; Matthew Lehet; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Katharine N Thakkar
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Transient Pupil Dilation after Subsaccadic Microstimulation of Primate Frontal Eye Fields.

Authors:  Sebastian J Lehmann; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Examining implicit metacognition in 3.5-year-old children: an eye-tracking and pupillometric study.

Authors:  Markus Paulus; Joelle Proust; Beate Sodian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.