Literature DB >> 27940212

The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Joseph Arizpe1, Vincent Walsh2, Galit Yovel3, Chris I Baker4.   

Abstract

The spatial pattern of eye-movements to faces considered typical for neurologically healthy individuals is a roughly T-shaped distribution over the internal facial features with peak fixation density tending toward the left eye (observer's perspective). However, recent studies indicate that striking deviations from this classic pattern are common within the population and are highly stable over time. The classic pattern actually reflects the average of these various idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns across individuals. The natural categories and respective frequencies of different types of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns have not been specifically investigated before, so here we analyzed the spatial patterns of eye-movements for 48 participants to estimate the frequency of different kinds of individual eye-movement patterns to faces in the normal healthy population. Four natural clusters were discovered such that approximately 25% of our participants' fixation density peaks clustered over the left eye region (observer's perspective), 23% over the right eye-region, 31% over the nasion/bridge region of the nose, and 20% over the region spanning the nose, philthrum, and upper lips. We did not find any relationship between particular idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns and recognition performance. Individuals' eye-movement patterns early in a trial were more stereotyped than later ones and idiosyncratic fixation patterns evolved with time into a trial. Finally, while face inversion strongly modulated eye-movement patterns, individual patterns did not become less distinct for inverted compared to upright faces. Group-averaged fixation patterns do not represent individual patterns well, so exploration of such individual patterns is of value for future studies of visual cognition.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye-movements; Face perception; Face recognition; Idiosyncratic; Individual differences; Pattern similarity measure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27940212      PMCID: PMC5474224          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  76 in total

1.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

Authors:  R R Althoff; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Visual scanpaths in schizophrenia: is there a deficit in face recognition?

Authors:  L M Williams; C M Loughland; E Gordon; D Davidson
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Vision during voluntary saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  F C VOLKMANN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1962-05

4.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Gaze-fixation, brain activation, and amygdala volume in unaffected siblings of individuals with autism.

Authors:  Kim M Dalton; Brendon M Nacewicz; Andrew L Alexander; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Stable individual differences across images in human saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2008-03

8.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers.

Authors:  Eyal Mehoudar; Joseph Arizpe; Chris I Baker; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

10.  Nonverbal social behaviors of patients with bipolar mania during interactions with virtual humans.

Authors:  Eosu Kim; Jeonghun Ku; Jae-Jin Kim; Hyeongrae Lee; Kiwan Han; Sun I Kim; Hyun-Sang Cho
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.254

View more
  11 in total

1.  Neural Representations of Faces Are Tuned to Eye Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Stacchi; Meike Ramon; Junpeng Lao; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Foveal processing of emotion-informative facial features.

Authors:  Nazire Duran; Anthony P Atkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Avoiding potential pitfalls in visual search and eye-movement experiments: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Michael C Hout; Katrín J Alexdóttir; Stephen C Walenchok; Anthony S Barnhart
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Using dual eye tracking to uncover personal gaze patterns during social interaction.

Authors:  Shane L Rogers; Craig P Speelman; Oliver Guidetti; Melissa Longmuir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Eye Movement Dynamics Differ between Encoding and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L Noles; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 6.  How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

7.  The COVID-19 pandemic masks the way people perceive faces.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Andreja Stajduhar; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Galia Avidan; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Implying social interaction and its influence on gaze behavior to the eyes.

Authors:  Gijs A Holleman; Roy S Hessels; Chantal Kemner; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Looking behavior and potential human interactions during locomotion.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels; Jeroen S Benjamins; Andrea J van Doorn; Jan J Koenderink; Gijs A Holleman; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  From eye to arrow: Attention capture by direct gaze requires more than just the eyes.

Authors:  Christina Breil; Lynn Huestegge; Anne Böckler
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.