Literature DB >> 29424000

A threshold-free summary index of prediction accuracy for censored time to event data.

Yan Yuan1, Qian M Zhou2,3, Bingying Li3, Hengrui Cai1, Eric J Chow4, Gregory T Armstrong5.   

Abstract

Prediction performance of a risk scoring system needs to be carefully assessed before its adoption in clinical practice. Clinical preventive care often uses risk scores to screen asymptomatic population. The primary clinical interest is to predict the risk of having an event by a prespecified future time t0 . Accuracy measures such as positive predictive values have been recommended for evaluating the predictive performance. However, for commonly used continuous or ordinal risk score systems, these measures require a subjective cutoff threshold value that dichotomizes the risk scores. The need for a cutoff value created barriers for practitioners and researchers. In this paper, we propose a threshold-free summary index of positive predictive values that accommodates time-dependent event status and competing risks. We develop a nonparametric estimator and provide an inference procedure for comparing this summary measure between 2 risk scores for censored time to event data. We conduct a simulation study to examine the finite-sample performance of the proposed estimation and inference procedures. Lastly, we illustrate the use of this measure on a real data example, comparing 2 risk score systems for predicting heart failure in childhood cancer survivors.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  censored event time; positive predictive value; precision-recall curve; risk prediction; screening; time-dependent prediction accuracy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29424000      PMCID: PMC5895543          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  27 in total

Review 1.  Uses and abuses of screening tests.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Quantifying and comparing the predictive accuracy of continuous prognostic factors for binary outcomes.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Estimation of prediction error for survival models.

Authors:  Jerald F Lawless; Yan Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimating subject-specific dependent competing risk profile with censored event time observations.

Authors:  Yi Li; Lu Tian; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk.

Authors:  Jaana Lindström; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Individual prediction of heart failure among childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eric J Chow; Yan Chen; Leontien C Kremer; Norman E Breslow; Melissa M Hudson; Gregory T Armstrong; William L Border; Elizabeth A M Feijen; Daniel M Green; Lillian R Meacham; Kathleen A Meeske; Daniel A Mulrooney; Kirsten K Ness; Kevin C Oeffinger; Charles A Sklar; Marilyn Stovall; Helena J van der Pal; Rita E Weathers; Leslie L Robison; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Cause-specific late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Ann C Mertens; Qi Liu; Joseph P Neglia; Karen Wasilewski; Wendy Leisenring; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.816

View more
  6 in total

1.  ECG-Based Deep Learning and Clinical Risk Factors to Predict Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Shaan Khurshid; Samuel Friedman; Christopher Reeder; Paolo Di Achille; Nathaniel Diamant; Pulkit Singh; Lia X Harrington; Xin Wang; Mostafa A Al-Alusi; Gopal Sarma; Andrea S Foulkes; Patrick T Ellinor; Christopher D Anderson; Jennifer E Ho; Anthony A Philippakis; Puneet Batra; Steven A Lubitz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Predicting acute ovarian failure in female survivors of childhood cancer: a cohort study in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) and the St Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE).

Authors:  Rebecca A Clark; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Yutaka Yasui; Ngoc Khanh Vu; Charles A Sklar; Tarek Motan; Russell J Brooke; Todd M Gibson; Kevin C Oeffinger; Rebecca M Howell; Susan A Smith; Zhe Lu; Leslie L Robison; Wassim Chemaitilly; Melissa M Hudson; Gregory T Armstrong; Paul C Nathan; Yan Yuan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Development and validation of optimal phenomapping methods to estimate long-term atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Matthew W Segar; Kershaw V Patel; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Melissa C Caughey; Byron C Jaeger; Mujeeb Basit; Duwayne Willett; Javed Butler; Partho P Sengupta; Thomas J Wang; Darren K McGuire; Ambarish Pandey
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Correlation-adjusted regression survival scores for high-dimensional variable selection.

Authors:  Thomas Welchowski; Verena Zuber; Matthias Schmid
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Improved sequence-based prediction of interaction sites in α-helical transmembrane proteins by deep learning.

Authors:  Jianfeng Sun; Dmitrij Frishman
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  A relationship between the incremental values of area under the ROC curve and of area under the precision-recall curve.

Authors:  Qian M Zhou; Lu Zhe; Russell J Brooke; Melissa M Hudson; Yan Yuan
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2021-07-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.