Literature DB >> 20670303

Robust prediction of t-year survival with data from multiple studies.

Tianxi Cai1, Thomas A Gerds, Yingye Zheng, Jinbo Chen.   

Abstract

Recently meta-analysis has been widely utilized to combine information across multiple studies to evaluate a common effect. Integrating data from similar studies is particularly useful in genomic studies where the individual study sample sizes are not large relative to the number of parameters of interest. In this article, we are interested in developing robust prognostic rules for the prediction of t-year survival based on multiple studies. We propose to construct a composite score for prediction by fitting a stratified semiparametric transformation model that allows the studies to have related but not identical outcomes. To evaluate the accuracy of the resulting score, we provide point and interval estimators for the commonly used accuracy measures including the time-specific receiver operating characteristic curves, and positive and negative predictive values. We apply the proposed procedures to develop prognostic rules for the 5-year survival of breast cancer patients based on five breast cancer genomic studies.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20670303      PMCID: PMC2987565          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01462.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  24 in total

1.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Construction and validation of a prognostic model across several studies, with an application in superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer.

Authors:  Liat Ein-Dor; Or Zuk; Eytan Domany
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  A systematic review of analytical methods used to study subgroups in (individual patient data) meta-analyses.

Authors:  Laura Koopman; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Paul P Glasziou; Diederick E Grobbee; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.

Authors:  Wenyu Jiang; Richard Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Semiparametric efficient estimation in the generalized odds-rate class of regression models for right-censored time-to-event data.

Authors:  D O Scharfstein; A A Tsiatis; P B Gilbert
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers.

Authors:  Scott L Carter; Aron C Eklund; Isaac S Kohane; Lyndsay N Harris; Zoltan Szallasi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies.

Authors:  Koei Chin; Sandy DeVries; Jane Fridlyand; Paul T Spellman; Ritu Roydasgupta; Wen-Lin Kuo; Anna Lapuk; Richard M Neve; Zuwei Qian; Tom Ryder; Fanqing Chen; Heidi Feiler; Taku Tokuyasu; Chris Kingsley; Shanaz Dairkee; Zhenhang Meng; Karen Chew; Daniel Pinkel; Ajay Jain; Britt Marie Ljung; Laura Esserman; Donna G Albertson; Frederic M Waldman; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Gene expression profiling spares early breast cancer patients from adjuvant therapy: derived and validated in two population-based cohorts.

Authors:  Yudi Pawitan; Judith Bjöhle; Lukas Amler; Anna-Lena Borg; Suzanne Egyhazi; Per Hall; Xia Han; Lars Holmberg; Fei Huang; Sigrid Klaar; Edison T Liu; Lance Miller; Hans Nordgren; Alexander Ploner; Kerstin Sandelin; Peter M Shaw; Johanna Smeds; Lambert Skoog; Sara Wedrén; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Large-scale integration of cancer microarray data identifies a robust common cancer signature.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Donald Geman; Raimond L Winslow
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Retrospective likelihood-based methods for analyzing case-cohort genetic association studies.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Shen; Tianxi Cai; Yu Chen; Ying Yang; Jinbo Chen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Causal mediation analysis on failure time outcome without sequential ignorability.

Authors:  Cheng Zheng; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of diagnostic and prognostic modeling studies: guidance on their use.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Richard D Riley; Maroeska M Rovers; Johannes B Reitsma; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications.

Authors:  Adina Najwa Kamarudin; Trevor Cox; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  The use of prognostic scores for causal inference with general treatment regimes.

Authors:  Tri-Long Nguyen; Thomas P A Debray
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Assessment of heterogeneity in an individual participant data meta-analysis of prediction models: An overview and illustration.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Daan Nieboer; Thomas P A Debray; Hans C van Houwelingen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.