Literature DB >> 15122736

Quantifying and comparing the accuracy of binary biomarkers when predicting a failure time outcome.

Chaya S Moskowitz1, Margaret S Pepe.   

Abstract

The positive and negative predictive values are standard measures used to quantify the predictive accuracy of binary biomarkers when the outcome being predicted is also binary. When the biomarkers are instead being used to predict a failure time outcome, there is no standard way of quantifying predictive accuracy. We propose a natural extension of the traditional predictive values to accommodate censored survival data. We discuss not only quantifying predictive accuracy using these extended predictive values, but also rigorously comparing the accuracy of two biomarkers in terms of their predictive values. Using a marginal regression framework, we describe how to estimate differences in predictive accuracy and how to test whether the observed difference is statistically significant. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15122736     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

1.  A C-index for recurrent event data: Application to hospitalizations among dialysis patients.

Authors:  Sehee Kim; Douglas E Schaubel; Keith P McCullough
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Gene expression-based prognostic signatures in lung cancer: ready for clinical use?

Authors:  Jyothi Subramanian; Richard Simon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers in nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Germline genetic variation and treatment response on CCG-1891.

Authors:  Dana M Sepe; Thomas McWilliams; Jinbo Chen; Aaron Kershenbaum; Huaqing Zhao; Mei La; Meenakshi Devidas; Beverly Lange; Timothy R Rebbeck; Richard Aplenc
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers under competing risk.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Yuying Jin; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The prognostic and predictive value of sstr2-immunohistochemistry and sstr2-targeted imaging in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Philippe Brunner; Ann-Catherine Jörg; Katharina Glatz; Lukas Bubendorf; Piotr Radojewski; Maria Umlauft; Nicolas Marincek; Petar-Marko Spanjol; Thomas Krause; Rebecca A Dumont; Helmut R Maecke; Jan Müller-Brand; Matthias Briel; Anja Schmitt; Aurel Perren; Martin A Walter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  A genomic predictor of response and survival following taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Christos Hatzis; Lajos Pusztai; Vicente Valero; Daniel J Booser; Laura Esserman; Ana Lluch; Tatiana Vidaurre; Frankie Holmes; Eduardo Souchon; Hongkun Wang; Miguel Martin; José Cotrina; Henry Gomez; Rebekah Hubbard; J Ignacio Chacón; Jaime Ferrer-Lozano; Richard Dyer; Meredith Buxton; Yun Gong; Yun Wu; Nuhad Ibrahim; Eleni Andreopoulou; Naoto T Ueno; Kelly Hunt; Wei Yang; Arlene Nazario; Angela DeMichele; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Publication of tumor marker research results: the necessity for complete and transparent reporting.

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Semiparametric models of time-dependent predictive values of prognostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Janet L Stanford; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Time-dependent Predictive Values of Prognostic Biomarkers with Failure Time Outcome.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Margaret S Pepe; Wayne C Levy
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.