Literature DB >> 22844169

Non-parametric Evaluation of Biomarker Accuracy under Nested Case-control Studies.

Tianxi Cai1, Yingye Zheng.   

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical utility of new risk markers, a crucial step is to measure their predictive accuracy with prospective studies. However, it is often infeasible to obtain marker values for all study participants. The nested case-control (NCC) design is a useful cost-effective strategy for such settings. Under the NCC design, markers are only ascertained for cases and a fraction of controls sampled randomly from the risk sets. The outcome dependent sampling generates a complex data structure and therefore a challenge for analysis. Existing methods for analyzing NCC studies focus primarily on association measures. Here, we propose a class of non-parametric estimators for commonly used accuracy measures. We derived asymptotic expansions for accuracy estimators based on both finite population and Bernoulli sampling and established asymptotic equivalence between the two. Simulation results suggest that the proposed procedures perform well in finite samples. The new procedures were illustrated with data from the Framingham Offspring study.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22844169      PMCID: PMC3404857          DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  17 in total

1.  Median regression with censored cost data.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Anastasios A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.

Authors:  Patrick J Heagerty; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Yingye Zheng; Thomas Lumley; Nancy Swords Jenny
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The Nurses' Health Study: 20-year contribution to the understanding of health among women.

Authors:  G A Colditz; J E Manson; S E Hankinson
Journal:  J Womens Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Time-dependent Predictive Values of Prognostic Biomarkers with Failure Time Outcome.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Margaret S Pepe; Wayne C Levy
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; M Feinleib; P M McNamara; R J Garrison; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  12 in total

1.  Efficient Estimation of Semiparametric Transformation Models for Two-Phase Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Donglin Zeng; D Y Lin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Assessment of biomarkers for risk prediction with nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Qian M Zhou; Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN BIOMARKER INCREMENTAL VALUE EVALUATION UNDER TWO-PHASE DESIGNS.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Marshall Brown; Anna Lok; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in matched case control studies.

Authors:  Hui Xu; Jing Qian; Nina P Paynter; Xuehong Zhang; Brian W Whitcomb; Shelley S Tworoger; Kathryn M Rexrode; Susan E Hankinson; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Covariate measurement error correction methods in mediation analysis with failure time data.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhao; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Biomarker evaluation under imperfect nested case-control design.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Yingye Zheng; Majken Karoline Jensen; Zeling He; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Assessing incremental value of biomarkers with multi-phase nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Qian M Zhou; Yingye Zheng; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Resampling Procedures for Making Inference under Nested Case-control Studies.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Robust risk prediction with biomarkers under two-phase stratified cohort design.

Authors:  Rebecca Payne; Ming Yang; Yingye Zheng; Majken K Jensen; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Dynamic landmark prediction for mixture data.

Authors:  Tanya P Garcia; Layla Parast
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.