Literature DB >> 19643418

In vivo measurement of shoulder joint loads during activities of daily living.

P Westerhoff1, F Graichen, A Bender, A Halder, A Beier, A Rohlmann, G Bergmann.   

Abstract

Until recently the contact loads acting in the glenohumeral joint have been calculated using musculoskeletal models or measured in vitro. Now, contact forces and moments are measured in vivo using telemeterized shoulder implants. Mean total contact forces from four patients during eight activities of daily living are reported here. Lifting a coffee pot (1.5kg) with straight arm caused an average force of 105.0%BW (%body weight) (range: 90-124.6%BW), while setting down the coffee pot in the same position led to higher forces of 122.9%BW on the average (105.3-153.4%BW). The highest joint contact forces were measured when the straight arm was abducted or elevated by 90 degrees or more, with a weight in the hand. Lifting up 2kg from a board up to head height caused a contact force of 98.3%BW (93-103.6%BW); again, setting it down on the board led to higher forces of 131.5%BW (118.8-144.1%BW). In contrast to previously calculated high loads, the contact force during passive holding of a 10kg weight laterally was only 12.3%BW (9.2-17.9%BW), but when lifting it up to belt height it increased to 91.5%BW (87-95%BW). The moments transferred inside the joint at our patients varied much more than did the forces both inter and intra-individually. Our data suggest that patients with shoulder problems or during the first post-operative weeks after shoulder fractures or joint replacements should avoid certain activities encountered during daily living e.g. lifting or holding a weight with an outstretched arm. Some energy-related optimization criteria used in the literature for analytical musculoskeletal shoulder models must now be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19643418     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  19 in total

1.  Computational analysis of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reverse shoulder prostheses.

Authors:  C Quental; J Folgado; P R Fernandes; J Monteiro
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Sensewheel: an adjunct to wheelchair skills training.

Authors:  Andrew Symonds; Stephen J G Taylor; Catherine Holloway
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2016-12-15

3.  Determination of a reference system for the three-dimensional study of the glenohumeral relationship.

Authors:  Tom R G M Verstraeten; Ellen Deschepper; Matthijs Jacxsens; Stig Walravens; Brecht De Coninck; Nicole Pouliart; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Periprosthetic fractures: concepts of biomechanical in vitro investigations.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; April D Armstrong; Wesley W Flint; Allen R Kunselman; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Jacob B Brenza; Emmanuel M Paul; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Upper extremity muscle volumes and functional strength after resistance training in older adults.

Authors:  Melissa Daly; Meghan E Vidt; Joel D Eggebeen; W Greg Simpson; Michael E Miller; Anthony P Marsh; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Modeling a rotator cuff tear: Individualized shoulder muscle forces influence glenohumeral joint contact force predictions.

Authors:  Meghan E Vidt; Anthony C Santago; Anthony P Marsh; Eric J Hegedus; Christopher J Tuohy; Gary G Poehling; Michael T Freehill; Michael E Miller; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.

Authors:  Xianlian Zhou; Liying Zheng
Journal:  IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors       Date:  2021-07-26

10.  Comparison between dry needling and focused ultrasound on the mechanical properties of the rat Achilles tendon: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sujata Khandare; Molly Smallcomb; Bailey Klein; Colby Geary; Julianna C Simon; Meghan E Vidt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.