Literature DB >> 23371339

Determination of a reference system for the three-dimensional study of the glenohumeral relationship.

Tom R G M Verstraeten1, Ellen Deschepper, Matthijs Jacxsens, Stig Walravens, Brecht De Coninck, Nicole Pouliart, Lieven F De Wilde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of the normal and pathological three-dimensional glenohumeral relationship is imperative when planning and performing a total shoulder arthroplasty. There is, however, no consensus on which references should be used when studying this relationship. The purpose of the present study was to define the most suitable glenoid plane with normally distributed parameters, narrowest variability, and best reproducibility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstruction CT scans were performed on 152 healthy shoulders. Four glenoid planes, each determined by three surgically accessible bony reference points, were determined. Two planes were triangular, with the same base defined by the most anterior and posterior point of the glenoid. The most inferior and the most superior point of the glenoid, respectively, define the top of Saller's inferior plane and the Saller's superior plane. The two other planes are formed by best-fitting circles. The circular max plane is defined by the superior tubercle, and two points at the distal third of the glenoid. The circular inferior plane is defined by three points at the rim of the inferior quadrants of the glenoid.
RESULTS: The parameters of all four planes behave normally. The humeral center of rotation is identically positioned for both the circular max and circular inferior plane (X = 91.71°/X = 91.66° p = 0.907 and Y = 90.83°/Y = 91.7° p = 0.054, respectively) and different for the Saller's inferior and Saller's superior plane (p ≤ 0.001). The circular inferior plane has the lowest variability to the coronal scapular plane (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides arguments to use the circular inferior glenoid plane as preferred reference plane of the glenoid.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371339     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1572-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  38 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of a scapula implanted with a glenoid prosthesis.

Authors:  B Couteau; P Mansat; E Estivalèzes; R Darmana; M Mansat; J Egan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.

Authors:  L F De Wilde; B M Berghs; E Audenaert; G Sys; G O Van Maele; E Barbaix
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  The radiographic study in the relationship of the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  Katsumi Takase; Kengo Yamamoto; Atsuhiro Imakiire; Wayne Zealous Burkhead
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Glenoid version: how to measure it? Validity of different methods in two-dimensional computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Dominique M Rouleau; Jacob F Kidder; Juan Pons-Villanueva; Savvas Dynamidis; Michael Defranco; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Three-dimensional glenoid deformity in patients with osteoarthritis: a radiographic analysis.

Authors:  P Habermeyer; P Magosch; V Luz; S Lichtenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The relationship of glenoid and humeral version with supraspinatus tendon tears.

Authors:  Nil Tokgoz; Ulunay Kanatli; Nuray Kadioglu Voyvoda; Serap Gultekin; Selcuk Bolukbasi; E Turgut Tali
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Reliability of the glenoid plane.

Authors:  Lieven F De Wilde; T Verstraeten; W Speeckaert; A Karelse
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  The glenoid notch and its relation to the shape of the glenoid cavity of the scapula.

Authors:  A Prescher; T Klümpen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study.

Authors:  R S Churchill; J J Brems; H Kotschi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04
View more
  11 in total

1.  Effect of glenohumeral elevation on subacromial supraspinatus compression risk during simulated reaching.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Dustin M Schlangen; Katelyn A Schneider; Jonathan Schoenecker; Andrea L Senger; William C Starr; Justin L Staker; Jutta M Ellermann; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  In vivo kinematic analysis of the glenohumeral joint during dynamic full axial rotation and scapular plane full abduction in healthy shoulders.

Authors:  Naoya Kozono; Takamitsu Okada; Naohide Takeuchi; Satoshi Hamai; Hidehiko Higaki; Satoru Ikebe; Takeshi Shimoto; Go Miake; Yoshitaka Nakanishi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effect of glenohumeral plane of elevation on supraspinatus subacromial proximity.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; William C Sessions; Megan C Jensen; Justin L Staker; Aya Eid; Ryan Breighner; Nathaniel E Helwig; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle.

Authors:  Thomas Suter; Ariane Gerber Popp; Yue Zhang; Chong Zhang; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Reliability of the Fluoroscopic Assessment of Load-Induced Glenohumeral Translation during a 30° Shoulder Abduction Test.

Authors:  Eleonora Croci; Marina Künzler; Sean Börlin; Franziska Eckers; Corina Nüesch; Daniel Baumgartner; Andreas Marc Müller; Annegret Mündermann
Journal:  Biomechanics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19

6.  Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Shireen Y Elhabian; Sarah E Brady; Peter N Chalmers; Andreas M Mueller; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  The Muscle Cross-sectional Area on MRI of the Shoulder Can Predict Muscle Volume: An MRI Study in Cadavers.

Authors:  Heath B Henninger; Garrett V Christensen; Carolyn E Taylor; Jun Kawakami; Bradley S Hillyard; Robert Z Tashjian; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Can an extracorporeal glenoid aiming device be used to optimize the position of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tom R G M Verstraeten; Bart Berghs; Alexander Van Tongel; David Volders; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

9.  Consequences of reaming with flat and convex reamers for bone volume and surface area of the glenoid; a basic science study.

Authors:  Anne Karelse; Steven Leuridan; Alexander Van Tongel; Philippe Debeer; Jos Van Der Sloten; Kathleen Denis; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  A computed tomography analysis of three-dimensional glenoid orientation modified by glenoid torsion.

Authors:  Noboru Matsumura; Satoshi Oki; Taku Suzuki; Takuji Iwamoto; Kazuki Sato; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.